Linear partial differnetial equations (PDE's)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Partial
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around linear partial differential equations (PDEs), specifically focusing on an example from a textbook that illustrates different cases of solutions based on boundary conditions. Participants are examining the reasoning behind the inclusion of certain functions in the solutions and the implications of different boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the rationale for adding a function in one case but not in another, exploring the differences in boundary conditions, and discussing the implications of choosing different forms for functions in the solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and clarifications regarding the differences between the cases presented in the problem. Some have offered insights into the nature of boundary conditions and their impact on the uniqueness of solutions, while others express confusion and seek further guidance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the textbook may not clearly emphasize critical aspects of the problem, leading to questions about the assumptions and definitions involved in the cases discussed.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please take a look at the example at the bottom (at eq. 18:18, at page 619):

http://books.google.dk/books?id=9p6...g=iAUGf-f9d5uHRwwYZnpFpA8HJDA&hl=da#PPA619,M1

Q1: In case (ii), why do they add g(x^2+y^2)?
Q2: Why do they not add it in case (i)?
Q3: In case (ii), if I chose f(p) = p + 1 instead of f(p) = 2p, then the solution would be u(x,y) = 1+ x^2 +y^2 + g(x^2 + y^2), right?

I hope you can help me; I find this really hard to understand, and I've spent hours trying to find out, but I find that the book is poorly written. They don't emphasize the important things at all, and the reader is left behind with so many questions.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference between (ii) and (i) is that in (i) it is a function, but in (ii) it is a single point. Although I am not sure about this?
 
Can you guys give me a hint? I still can't see the system in it.
 
The difference between i) and ii) is that in i) the boundary conditions are given along a line y=0 and in ii) they are specified only a a single point. In the first case that's enough information to specify a unique solution. In the second case you can add a general function that solves the homogeneous equation (g(x^2+y^2)) subject to only one condition. I don't see why they are messing around with splitting g into two parts. That is confusing. I would just write the solution as -3y+g(x^2+y^2) subject to the condition g(1)=2. Your other form for Q3 is fine, but you forgot to put the -3y in it.
 
Thank you for taking the time to help me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K