Linear Programming -OR- Engineering Economics?

AI Thread Summary
For undergraduate Chemical Engineering students considering electives, understanding economics is emphasized as crucial for decision-making in the field. Engineering Economics is recommended due to its practical application, especially since students typically possess strong math skills that facilitate learning concepts like linear programming. Previous experience with macroeconomics is noted, but the focus is on the practicality of the upcoming course. Additionally, taking a math course tailored for physical sciences is suggested to enhance problem-solving skills with the tools learned in engineering.
amb123
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
As an elective for undergraduate Chem Engineer, which would be better to have?

Thanks.
-A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you should have an understanding of economics. This plays a role in decisions making.
 
I say Eng Econ. If you're a Chem Eng major then you are going to have plenty of math under your belt, and you should be able to digest linear programming sans probleme. I never took linear programming, and in the space of an hour I learned enough of it to tutor a kid who was taking the class.
 
Thanks, guys. I have taken Macro Eco already, but it has been a while. I was not a huge fan, but I think this course will be more practical.

I am also planning to take a math course to help me use the tools I have learned in practical problems. [Math for physical sciences].

-A
 

Thread 'Where did all the “fundamentals-deepening” master’s programs go?'

I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
View full post »

Thread 'Applied Math PhD candidate but I hate group theory'

TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
View full post »

Similar threads

Undergraduate ABET and MS non-ABET
Replies
14
Views
3K
Other How can I fill course requirements for Physics Master's program?
Replies
4
Views
819
Courses Masters in Civil Engineering with a Bachelor in general engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Programs From a Nuclear Engineering BS, will I be able to do MS & PhD in Physics?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Programs What Do People Think Of Competency Based Degrees Such as Texas A&M Commerce
Replies
4
Views
2K
What's the best major between Physics & Chemistry for entering MS in Nuclear Engineering?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Programs Materials Engineering Undergrad Reflection
Replies
8
Views
1K
Programs Certificate Program in Medical Physics - Advice for a Bioengineer
Replies
3
Views
1K
Is this a good self-study program?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Need study advice before starting a Masters program in Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top