Linear Programming -OR- Engineering Economics?

AI Thread Summary
For undergraduate Chemical Engineering students considering electives, understanding economics is emphasized as crucial for decision-making in the field. Engineering Economics is recommended due to its practical application, especially since students typically possess strong math skills that facilitate learning concepts like linear programming. Previous experience with macroeconomics is noted, but the focus is on the practicality of the upcoming course. Additionally, taking a math course tailored for physical sciences is suggested to enhance problem-solving skills with the tools learned in engineering.
amb123
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
As an elective for undergraduate Chem Engineer, which would be better to have?

Thanks.
-A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you should have an understanding of economics. This plays a role in decisions making.
 
I say Eng Econ. If you're a Chem Eng major then you are going to have plenty of math under your belt, and you should be able to digest linear programming sans probleme. I never took linear programming, and in the space of an hour I learned enough of it to tutor a kid who was taking the class.
 
Thanks, guys. I have taken Macro Eco already, but it has been a while. I was not a huge fan, but I think this course will be more practical.

I am also planning to take a math course to help me use the tools I have learned in practical problems. [Math for physical sciences].

-A
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top