Linear Transformations Rn->Rm Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the linear transformation T: Rn to Rm defined by T(x, y) = (2x, y). Participants seek clarification on the notation used in the solution manual, specifically the introduction of variables x1, y1, x2, and y2. The transformation is validated using the linearity conditions, particularly T(u + v) = T(u) + T(v). However, it is noted that the proof is incomplete as it omits the second condition, T(cu) = cT(u). The conversation emphasizes the importance of both conditions in proving linearity.
haribol
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Linear Transformations Rn-->Rm Question

I would be very grateful if someone can explain what is going on in the following problem:

Determine whether the following T:Rn to Rm

T(x,y)=(2x,y)

Solution from solutions manual:

T((x1,y1) + (x2,y2)) = (2(x1+x2), y1+y2) = (2x1,y1) + (2x2,y2) = T(x1,y1) + T(x2,y2)

My questions are

1. Where did the x1's and the x2's and the y1's and the y2's come from?

2. Can you please explain what's happening step by step?



[PS]--> The questions asks to use the theorem which states:

A transformation T:Rn --> Rm is linear if and only if the following relationships hold for all vectors u and v in Rn and every scalar c

a) T(u+v) = T(u) + T(v)

b)T(cu) = cT(u)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haribol said:
I would be very grateful if someone can explain what is going on in the following problem:

Determine whether the following T:Rn to Rm

T(x,y)=(2x,y)

Solution from solutions manual:

T((x1,y1) + (x2,y2)) = (2(x1+x2), y1+y2) = (2x1,y1) + (2x2,y2) = T(x1,y1) + T(x2,y2)

My questions are

1. Where did the x1's and the x2's and the y1's and the y2's come from?

2. Can you please explain what's happening step by step?



[PS]--> The questions asks to use the theorem which states:

A transformation T:Rn --> Rm is linear if and only if the following relationships hold for all vectors u and v in Rn and every scalar c

a) T(u+v) = T(u) + T(v)

b)T(cu) = cT(u)

He has set \vec{u} = (x_1,y_1), \ \ \vec{v} = (x_2,y_2) and showed using vector addition properties that T(\vec{u}+\vec{v}) = T(\vec{u})+T(\vec{v})
This proof is imcomplete though because he left out condition b).
 
Thank you quasar987 for the clarification. The manual does include the proof using condition b) but I forgot to type it.

Thanks for that clarification.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top