Linearity of Schrodinger Equation

dainylee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please address this question?
How do you algebraically demonstrate the superposition principle revealed by the Schrodinger equation (ie. If Psi1(x,t) and Psi2(x,t) are both solutions then Psi(x,t)= Psi1(x,t)+Psi2(x,t) is also a solution.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you get when you substitute Psi(x,t) into the left side of the Schrodinger equation?
 
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?
 
No, \psi(x,t) is not in there. However, you do know that \psi_1(x,t) is a solution -

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_1(x,t)+V(x)\psi_1(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_1(x,t)And \psi_2(x,t) is also in there:

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_2(x,t)+V(x)\psi_2(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_2(x,t)However, you have to show that \psi=\psi_1+\psi_2 also satisfies this dynamic equation.

And then you can extend your result to a\psi_1 + b\psi_2 for any coefficents a,b.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dainylee said:
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?

You have to show that

<br /> -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \Psi(x,t) + V(x) \Psi(x,t) = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \Psi (x,t).<br />

In the left, substitute \Psi = \Psi_1 + \Psi_2, and, using that \Psi_1 and \Psi_2 both statisfy Schrodinger's equation, work your way to the right side of the equation you must show true.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top