Linewidths - Frequency and Wavelength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between line widths in frequency and wavelength, highlighting a common confusion. It is noted that a broader spread of frequencies should correspond to a broader spread of wavelengths. The mathematical relationship derived from the equation c = fλ indicates that changes in frequency (df) and changes in wavelength (dλ) have opposite signs. This leads to confusion about why a positive change in frequency results in a negative change in wavelength. The conversation reassures that understanding this relationship is achievable with confidence in mathematical principles.
Naz93
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
Hi,

Probably a really stupid question... but I'm confused about how to relate a line width in frequency to one in wavelength. To me it seems obvious that if there's a broader spread of frequencies, there must be a broader spread of wavelengths, and vice versa - after all, the line is broader.

But... if you relate Δf and Δλ mathematically (f is frequency, since there was no nu on the quick symbols list):

c = fλ

f = c/λ

df/dλ = -c/(λ^2)

so df = dλ * (-c/(λ^2))

I.e. if df is positive, dλ is negative...

What am I doing wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where's the problem in that? One slope is positive and the other is negative - that's what you get when you have

λ= c/f and you write down dλ/df

No worries. Have faith in yourself and your maths.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top