Linking current-carrying wires to magnets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cluelessness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets Wires
AI Thread Summary
Current-carrying wires, such as solenoids, generate magnetic fields due to the movement of electric charges, similar to how magnets produce fields from the aligned spins of their electrons. The relationship between the two is primarily explained by Ampere's Law, which describes how electric currents create magnetic fields. While magnets have stable magnetic fields from electron alignment, they do not require a current like solenoids do. The discussion clarifies that the magnetic properties of materials stem from the synchronized movement of electrons rather than direct current flow. Understanding these principles helps bridge the concepts of magnetism and electric currents.
Cluelessness
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This may be an obvious question but I have no idea:
How can anyone link current-carrying wires (solenoids) and its formulae, to magnets?!
All I've researched so far points out that magnets have their own stable magnetic field, attributed to the alignment of spins of the electrons of the atoms which the magnet is composed of. But is that all to it? Are there any other relationships, anything that I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Cluelessness! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Cluelessness said:
How can anyone link current-carrying wires (solenoids) and its formulae, to magnets?!
…
But is that all to it?

Basically, yes.

The only thing that causes magnetic fields is the movement of electric charge.

Even a charge moving with uniform velocity has a magnetic field.

Mechanically useful magnetic fields come from circular motion or spin of charges.

There's no essential difference between the tiny circular motion or spin of electrons in a magnet and the large-scale circular motion of electrons in a solenoid. :wink:
 
Thanks a lot tiny-tim! :D
Does that mean magnets exhibit magnetic properties solely due to synchronised movement of electrons i.e aligned domains? So this means that a current is not required like a solenoid? Or do aligned domains produce a current?
Sorry, I'm nearly there...I think :)
 
i'm really not familiar with magnetic domains, or magnetisable material generally :redface:

i think that if there was a current, it would be called a polarisation current, rather than something to do with magnetism :confused:
 
Cluelessness said:
This may be an obvious question but I have no idea:
How can anyone link current-carrying wires (solenoids) and its formulae, to magnets?!
All I've researched so far points out that magnets have their own stable magnetic field, attributed to the alignment of spins of the electrons of the atoms which the magnet is composed of. But is that all to it? Are there any other relationships, anything that I'm missing?
There is no link between electron spin, and the currents in a (air core) solenoidal coil producing a magnetic field. The magnetic field is due to Ampere's Law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampère's_circuital_law.
Electrons do have orbital and intrinsic spin dipole fields, which do impact magnetic materials and EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance).

The on-axis field in a solenoid is given in http://www.phys.uri.edu/~gerhard/PHY204/tsl215.pdf
 
Sorry for replying so late! ><
Thanks guys! I really appreciate it :D
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Thread 'Why measure the speed of light in one direction?'

It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
View full post »

Similar threads

Why Doesn't Electric Force Cause Wires to Move?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I How induction works within a coil (nuances of it)
Replies
6
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy on Current-Carrying Wire in Magnetic Field
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Resulting magnetic field due to the passage of an AC current
Replies
27
Views
2K
I Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
Replies
5
Views
861
I Does a Railgun's Current Violate Conservation of Momentum?
2
Replies
61
Views
5K
Electromagnet and a current carrying wire
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Work Done in Changing Shape of Current Carrying Loop
Replies
5
Views
2K
Magnetic Field: Inside & Outside Current Carrying Wire
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Magnetic field as result of length contraction
Replies
20
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top