Other List of STEM Masterworks in Physics, Mechanics, Electrodynamics...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demystifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    List Stem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on identifying authoritative and comprehensive textbooks in STEM fields, referred to as "STEM Bibles." Participants suggest various texts across disciplines, emphasizing their depth, respect within the community, and comprehensive coverage of subjects. Key physics texts mentioned include "The Feynman Lectures on Physics," "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein, and "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson. Quantum mechanics discussions highlight the lack of consensus on a definitive "bible," with suggestions like Griffiths and Ballentine being debated for their comprehensiveness and authority. Other fields such as medical physiology and electrical engineering are also discussed, with texts like Guyton's "Medical Physiology" and Sze's "Physics of Semiconductor Devices" being proposed. The conversation reflects a blend of personal preferences and community standards, with some participants questioning the criteria for a book to achieve "bible" status, particularly regarding size and depth. The dialogue showcases a rich exchange of opinions on essential literature across various scientific disciplines.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #33
Herbert Schildt, C++, the complete reference
Éric Gourgoulhon, Special Relativity in General Frames: From Particles to Astrophysics
Thanu Padmanabhan, Gravitation: Foundations and frontiers

P.S.
Padmanabhan's theoretical astrophysics(in 3 volumes) also comes to my mind, but I haven't read it myself, so I'm putting it down as a maybe.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and atyy
  • #34
Uups. That I should have indeed done ;-)). It's in now!

Also I don't think that for a textbook to become "bible status" it doesn't need to be big. To the contrary. Sometimes a shorter text that comes to the point quickly is better than many words. A prime example is the 6-volume series by Pauli. Much content on a few pages without being too sparse in explaining the calculations. A masterpiece!
 
  • Like
Likes SolarisOne, Demystifier and bhobba
  • #35
DrClaude said:
Why not Ballentine? Some time ago Messiah may have been a bible, but I think it is too old now.

vanhees71 said:
Here's my list. I take the freedom to also mention some German textbooks (order roughly reflects my opinion about the quality). It's for sure incomplete!

Textbook series (theory course):

A. Sommerfeld, Lectures on Theoretical Physics (6 vols)
M. Bartelmann et al, Theoretische Physik
W. Weizel, Lehrbuch der theoretischen Physik (2 vols)
R. P. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures (3 vols)
L.D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Course on Theoretical Physics (10 vols)
W. Pauli, Lectures on Theoretical Physics (6 vols)
W. Greiner et al Theoretical Physics (13 vols)

QM:

P.A.M. Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics
W. Pauli, Principles of Wave Mechanics
L. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics
J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics
S. Weinberg, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics
A. Sommerfeld, Atombau und Spektrallinien (Wellenmechanischer Ergänzungsband)
Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (2 vols.)

Classical Physics:

K. Thorn, R.D. Blandford, Modern Classical Physics

E&M:

J. Schwinger et al, Classical Electrodynamics
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (2nd edition; 3rd is spoiled by using SI and Gaussian units in one book!)
M. Schwartz, Principles of Electrodynamics
D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics

(Quantum) Optics:

M. Born, E. Wolf, The Principles of Optics
J. C. Garrison, R. Y. Ciao, Quantum Optics
M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics
L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics

Relativistic Quantum Field Theory:

S. Weinberg, Quantum Theory of Fields (3 vols)
A. Duncan, The Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory
M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model
D. Bailin, A. Love, Introduction to Gauge Field Theory

Thermodynamics and (Quantum) Statistics:

H. B. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics
A. Katz, Principles of Statistical Mechanics
F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics

Thermal QFT

J. I. Kapusta, C. Gale, Finite-temperature Field Theory
M. Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory
M. Laine, A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory

Kinetic Theory


C. Cercignani, G. M. Kremer, The relativistic Boltzmann Equation
S. R. de Groot, W. A. van Leeuwen, Ch. G. van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory
H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation

It's disheartening to see Ballentine's garbage personal theory promoted.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes apostolosdt and Auto-Didact
  • #36
It's only you who thinks Ballentine's book is garbage. It's standard QT explained in a modern way. There's a bit too much "interpretation" in the book to my taste, but it also doesn't hurt to have some.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and strangerep
  • #37
vanhees71 said:
It's only you who thinks Ballentine's book is garbage. It's standard QT explained in a modern way. There's a bit too much "interpretation" in the book to my taste, but it also doesn't hurt to have some.

Ballentine fundamentally contradicts at least 4 of the other books (Dirac, Weinberg, Sakurai, Messiah) you listed as QM bibles.
 
  • Like
Likes Auto-Didact
  • #38
Where? You claim this from time to time, so please give a clear reference!
 
  • #39
vanhees71 said:
Where? You claim this from time to time, so please give a clear reference!

All of those 4 have collapse, which Ballentine mischaracterizes and repudiates.

Ballentine's error is not an incidental error (eg. the Feynman lectures have errors, but they are incidental, and can be corrected without disturbing the main thrust), but deep in his book, and explains why he also gets the result of the watched pot effect wrong.
 
  • #40
Well, that's an interpretational issue. As you well know, I'm also a proponent of the minimal interpretation and I also think that there's no need for a collapse. If some filter is used for preparation (e.g., in the Stern-Gerlach experiment taking only one partial beam with determined magnetic quantum number ##m##) it's working is well explained within the realm of local interactions of the Standard model, where by construction for sure is no instantaneous collapse. It's a sloppy description of a filter-preparation procedure which works FAPP in many cases, but it's contradicting the very construction of local relatistic QFTs.

All there is really physical about QM, i.e., the probabilistic description based on Born's rule is the very same in Ballentine as in any other standard QT textbook. The main point, why I recommend Ballentine is his use of the rigged-Hilbert space formalism in a physicist's way, avoiding much confusion about continuous spectra.
 
  • #41
Demystifier said:
It's really not my expertise, but isn't Guyton the bible of medical physiology too?

Not mine either, but I've heard that Guyton is especially good for the heart.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #42
Polchinski, String Theory

Hinman, Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic

Henry Gray, Anatomy

Kardar, Statistical Physics of Particles
Kardar, Statistical Physics of Fields
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #43
SICP
 
  • Like
Likes apostolosdt, Demystifier and atyy
  • #44
George Jones said:
If Halliday and Resnick can be included, than a book that is a something like a grad-level Halliday and Resnick also can be included, the amazing 1400+ page "Modern Classical Physics: Optics, Fluids, Plasmas, Elasticity, Relativity, and Statistical Physics" by (Nobel laureate) Thorne and Blandford

personally I wouldn't include Halliday and Resnick. In my opinion the only criterium this book matches is its volume.
 
  • #45
Newton's principia wins as candidate for the old testament.
 
  • Like
Likes SolarisOne, mathwonk, Auto-Didact and 2 others
  • #46
Panofsky Phillips Classical Electricity and Magnetism
Landau Lifsitz Classical Theory of Field
P.A.M. Dirac Theory of Relativity & Principles of Quantum Mechamics
Kubo Ichimura Statistical Mechanics

Those are my memorable texts ever.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes olddog, Demystifier and vanhees71
  • #48
You guys have left Lev Landau in the dust. He had several concise books on all areas of physics most notably:
English editions
Note that reprints and revised editions are not listed.

Volume 1
Covers classical mechanics without special or general relativity, in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms.

Volume 2
Covers relativistic mechanics of particles, and classical field theory for fields, specifically special relativity and electromagnetism, general relativity and gravitation.

Volume 3
Covers quantum mechanics without special relativity.

Volume 4
The original edition was two books, labelled part 1 and part 2. The first had general aspects of relativistic quantum mechanics and relativistic quantum field theory, leading onto quantum electrodynamics. The second continued on with quantum electrodynamics and what was then known about the strong and weak interactions. These books were published in the early 1970s, at a time when the strong and weak forces were still not well understood. In the second edition, the corresponding sections were scrapped and replaced with more topics in the well-established quantum electrodynamics, and the two parts were unified into one, thus providing a one-volume exposition on relativistic quantum field theory with the electromagnetic interaction as the prototype of a quantum field theory.

Volume 5
Covers general statistical mechanics and thermodynamics and applications, including chemical reactions, phase transitions, and condensed matter physics.

Volume 6
Covers fluid mechanics in a condensed but varied exposition, from ideal to viscous fluids, includes a chapter on relativistic fluid mechanics, and another on superfluids.

Volume 7
Covers elasticity theory of solids, including viscous solids, vibrations and waves in cystals with dislocations, and a chapter on the mechanics of liquid crystals.

Volume 8
Covers electromagnetism in materials, includes a variety of topics in condensed matter physics, a chapter on magnetohydrodynamics, and another on nonlinear optics.

Volume 9
Builds from the original statistical physics book; more applications to condensed matter theory.

Volume 10
Presents various applications of kinetic theory to condensed matter theory, on metals, insulators, and phase transitions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_of_Theoretical_Physics
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, Auto-Didact, sweet springs and 1 other person
  • #49
vanhees71 said:
W. Pauli, Principles of Wave Mechanics

I like this book two. A small defect I found in the first chapter is that he mistreats momentum of particle in infinite potential well.
 
Last edited:
  • #50
jedishrfu said:
You guys have left Lev Landau in the dust.

vanhees71 got that in post #18.
 
  • Like
Likes Auto-Didact, Demystifier and jedishrfu
  • #52
jedishrfu said:
You guys have left Lev Landau in the dust. He had several concise books on all areas of physics most notably:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_of_Theoretical_Physics
Many years ago I attempted to work through the entire course but after a few months I realized that at my pace it would take about 200 years for me to work through all the problems. At any rate, I am a big fan of the Russian school so my first choice for QFT is "Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics", Abrikosov, Gorkov and Dyaloshinski.
 
  • Like
Likes Cauer, vanhees71 and atyy
  • #53
Fred Wright said:
Many years ago I attempted to work through the entire course but after a few months I realized that at my pace it would take about 200 years for me to work through all the problems. At any rate, I am a big fan of the Russian school so my first choice for QFT is "Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics", Abrikosov, Gorkov and Dyaloshinski.

Me too. I couldn’t get past his first book. He was a brilliant physicist but not one for undergrads.
 
  • #54
On the mechanical engineering - fluid flow side, how about Crane 410? Complemented by Idel'chik.
 
  • #55
Gelfand, Generalized Functions, in 6 volumes.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #56
vanhees71 said:
L.D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Course on Theoretical Physics (10 vols)
W. Greiner et al Theoretical Physics (13 vols)
Landau and Lifshitz first came to mind when I saw the thread title. I didn't know about the series by Greiner et al.

I have the Feynman lectures (3 volumes).
 
  • Like
Likes olddog and dextercioby
  • #57
jasonRF said:
Gelfand, Generalized Functions, in 6 volumes.
Only 5, I believe, unless you know something I don't. :)
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #58
MathematicalPhysicist said:
@Demystifier did you read all the books you recommend here? ;-)
I didn't recommend Bourbaki, I just said that it is a bible for pure math. :wink:
But yes, I tried to read Bourbaki, just to experience what it feels like.
 
  • #59
vanhees71 said:
why I recommend Ballentine is his use of the rigged-Hilbert space formalism in a physicist's way
Ballentine indeed explains rigged Hilbert space very well, in a physics friendly language, but I wouldn't say that he really uses it.
 
  • #60
atyy said:
All of those 4 have collapse, which Ballentine mischaracterizes and repudiates.

Ballentine's error is not an incidental error (eg. the Feynman lectures have errors, but they are incidental, and can be corrected without disturbing the main thrust), but deep in his book, and explains why he also gets the result of the watched pot effect wrong.
From a modern perspective, the Ballentine's main problem is that he doesn't understand the importance of decoherence: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-008-9242-0.pdf
If he understood decoherence, he would also understand the illusion of collapse.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
19K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
466
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K