Liter estimations for a plankton net and copepods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Illyaria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Net
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the volume of seawater filtered through a plankton net and the number of copepods collected. The net's dimensions yield an estimated volume of approximately 991.7 liters of seawater filtered during a 100-meter tow. From the collection vial, counting 50 copepods in 1 mL leads to an estimate of 50,000 copepods in total. This results in a density of about 50 million copepods per liter of seawater sampled. For estimating copepods in the top meter of the Pacific Ocean, additional calculations based on surface area and volume are necessary, indicating a need for clarity on oceanic volume metrics.
Illyaria
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. You tow a plankton net submerged just below the surface of the Pacific Ocean for 100 meters. How many liters of seawater is filtered through the plankton net?

2. You count 50 copepods in 1 mL of the plankton net's collection vial.
A. Estimate the number of copepods in the entire collection goal.
B. Estimate the number of copepods/L of the seawater that you sampled.
C. Estimate the number of copepods in the top 1 meter of the Pacific Ocean.

Relevant information:
Net measurements:
- the circumference of the circular mouth of the net is 47cm. The length of the net is 211cm. The collection vial holds 1000 mL.

My attempts:
1. I determined the volume by mutiplying 47 and 211. I then multipled that answer by 100 to get 9.917x10^5 cm. I converted that to liters and got 9.917x10^2 L.

2. The collection vial is 1000 mL so I multiplied 50 copepods by 1000 to get 50,000 copepods for part A.

Part b: I converted 1 mL to L and divided my answer (50,000) by it to get 5x10^7 copepods per liter.

Part C. I don't even know where to begin but I guess convert my answer from b to meters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you got the volume in 1 right. Check the units.

You will need Pacific Ocean surface for 2c.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top