Could the Big Bang Have Created a Black Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mangog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the Big Bang could have created a black hole, questioning why the extreme density at that moment did not lead to one. It is suggested that the mass distribution was nearly homogeneous, causing gravity to cancel out across the universe, which prevented the formation of a black hole. Additionally, the concept of needing a region with less gravity than a black hole for its formation is highlighted, indicating that such conditions did not exist in the early universe. There is speculation about the possibility of primordial black holes arising from areas of higher density, but searches for these remnants have not yet yielded results. The conversation reflects a deep interest in cosmology and the fundamental forces at play during the universe's inception.
mangog
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've always wondered about this...if one sun over a certain size is enough (at the end of it's life) to become a black hole, then at the big bang, ALL the matter in the universe was in a very small space...so my question is why wasn't the big bang enough to actually create a black hole itself? Or maybe the big bang could be not a "big bang", but instead matter streaming into a black hole in a different universe and creating ours as it entered...

I have no idea, and I'm no scientist, but I am extremely fascinated by cosmology. I'm very open and eager to read answers to this - many thanks in advance
 
Space news on Phys.org
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=494036

tl;dr, the universe didn't happen inside another universe.Additionally, a black hole would probably require a more defined separation between gravity and the other forces, while most models suggest there was little if any such difference, with many models suggesting that all four forces become a single superforce at extremely high temperatures/energy densities.
 
Last edited:
mangog said:
I've always wondered about this...if one sun over a certain size is enough (at the end of it's life) to become a black hole, then at the big bang, ALL the matter in the universe was in a very small space...so my question is why wasn't the big bang enough to actually create a black hole itself? Or maybe the big bang could be not a "big bang", but instead matter streaming into a black hole in a different universe and creating ours as it entered...

I have no idea, and I'm no scientist, but I am extremely fascinated by cosmology. I'm very open and eager to read answers to this - many thanks in advance

The way I think of it is this. Whether this is right or not I dunno.

At the big bang the universe was packed with extreme density. But it appears that the distribution of the mass was almost homogenous, that is, there was almost exactly as much mass at point A as at point B. So gravity almost cancels out everywhere.

Another way to look at it is to have a black hole you have to have some place with less gravity than there is in the black hole. In the early Universe there was no such thing. There was no empty space whatsoever for a long time.

Now I said gravity almost cancels out. So there could be black holes left over from the old days from regions that had a little bit more density. A search is in progress, no luck as yet.
 
Extremely overdense regions in the very early universe would have stood out like a sore thumb in WMAP.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top