Ln(t) - t = 2; Solve for 't'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltapapazulu
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation ln(t) - t = 2 cannot be solved for 't' using elementary functions, as it is a transcendental equation. A graphical approach or numerical methods, such as using Excel for iterative solutions, can yield approximate values. By exponentiating both sides, the equation can be transformed into a form suitable for the Lambert-W function, which provides a way to express 't' in terms of this non-elementary function. The principal solution involves the ProductLog function, leading to a complex solution of t = -1.13902 - 2.07318i. Understanding the Lambert-W function is crucial for further exploration of such equations.
deltapapazulu
Messages
84
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Is there a simple way to solve for 't' in the equation: ln(t) - t = 2 ? Just a curiosity. Not for a class. I've browsed to texts that cover logarithmic equations and haven't found a single problem or rule say how to solve for 't'.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no way to get 't' in terms of elementary functions, but you can solve it graphically or perhaps using another complex function.
 
Trancendental equation.
No closed form solution.
Turn it into a game.
Calculate ln(t)-t vs t in Excel.
Play with t.
Stop when you get to an answer accurate to 6 decimal places, ie. 2.000001.
Now you will have developed some feel for the iterative solution of a trancendental equation. You can then read more about Newton-Raphson, etc.
 
Exponentiate both sides to get:

te^{-t} = e^2

Now, multiply both sides by -1 to get -te^{-t} = -e^2. This is now of the form of the Lambert-W function, defined by

W(z)e^{W(z)} = z,

which determines t in terms of the lambert W function. This function is not an elementary function, but much is known about it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W .
 

Mathematica 6 found a solution, however the numerical solution has a imaginary axis component.

ln(t) - t = 2

t = - ProductLog[-e^2]

ProductLog[z]
gives the principal solution for w in z=we^w.

The ProductLog[z] function is the Lambert-W function, however Mathematica 6 and 7 documentation does not mention this.

t = -1.13902 - 2.07318i
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W"
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/ProductLog.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top