- #1

- 59

- 0

Cheers Si.

- Thread starter Simon43254
- Start date

- #1

- 59

- 0

Cheers Si.

- #2

- 1,796

- 53

First understand the notation. Usually when we write ln, we mean the ordinary logarithm of a positive number. However, logarithm also makes sense for negative and complex numbers where the customary notation for that is log even though log in high-school is often used to explicitly mean log-base-10. This multiple use of log often causes problems and one often has to interpret the symbol within the context of the problem: if we're dealing with high-school algegra, then log probably means base-10. If however we're dealing with college Complex Variables, it usually means the complex logarithm base e.

The complex logarithm is valid for all complex numbers except zero and is most commonly defined in terms of the polar representation of a complex number [itex]x+iy=re^{it}[/itex]. Then:

[tex]log(re^{i\theta})=\ln(r)+i(\theta+2k\pi)[/tex]

where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the argument of the complex number and [itex]k=0,\pm 1,\pm2,\cdots[/itex] which makes this a "multi-valued" function although often we consider it's "principal value" with k=0. So in the case of [itex]\log(-x)[/itex] where x for example is 2, then the principal-valued logarithm of -2 is:

[tex]\log(-2)=\ln(2)+\pi i[/tex]

- #3

- 59

- 0

Thank you very much, this is the answer I was looking for. I had a feeling that there was going to be a formulation using complex number. Can I now revert you to the last line of my question?The complex logarithm is valid for all complex numbers except zero and is most commonly defined in terms of the polar representation of a complex number [itex]x+iy=re^{it}[/itex]. Then:

[tex]log(re^{i\theta})=\ln(r)+i(\theta+2k\pi)[/tex]

where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the argument of the complex number and [itex]k=0,\pm 1,\pm2,\cdots[/itex] which makes this a "multi-valued" function although often we consider it's "principal value" with k=0. So in the case of [itex]\log(-x)[/itex] where x for example is 2, then the principal-valued logarithm of -2 is:

[tex]\log(-2)=\ln(2)+\pi i[/tex]

- #4

- 1,796

- 53

The zeros to [itex](e^x+3)=0[/itex] are [itex]\log(-3)=\ln(3)+i(\pi+2k\pi)[/itex] and is consistent with the definition of log.Thank you very much, this is the answer I was looking for. I had a feeling that there was going to be a formulation using complex number. Can I now revert you to the last line of my question?

I can't answer the "always". I would imagine we can't always "invent" a new concept as a solution to something previously considered "invalid".

- #5

- 59

- 0

Thats interesting. I've always thought that the concept of invalidity was just another way of saying we don't know yet, someones hasn't created a new concept or a new way of thinking to solve this idea. But then I guess every time this occurred, you'd just create a new problem, needing a new solution, which would result in an infinite loop.

- #6

Mentallic

Homework Helper

- 3,798

- 94

What about log(0)?

- #7

Cyosis

Homework Helper

- 1,495

- 0

Log(0) remains indeterminate.

- #8

Mark44

Mentor

- 34,137

- 5,762

- #9

Mentallic

Homework Helper

- 3,798

- 94

I don't believe ln(0) is in indeterminate form, it is definitely undefined. Unless you can give me an example of where ln(0) is indeterminate...Log(0) remains indeterminate.

You've already been shown that this is given a quantity, and we don't have to construct a completely new extension on our number system for log(-1). The complex numbers are enough.Let Us take your expression:ln(-x)

=ln(-1*x)

=ln(-1)+ln(x)

do we arrive at something ,,,,NO it here seems improbable

unlike sqrt(-1) which is 'i'

so we have to define a new quantity here i.e ln(-1) say j then again unlike complex roots which have a geometrical representaion this quantity 'j' hhas none

- #10

Cyosis

Homework Helper

- 1,495

- 0

Indeed.Mark44 said:The word you want is "undefined."

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 11K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 7K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 9K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 983

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 758

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 2K