Local Coordinates for Non-Uniformly Accelerated Observer

LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I'm reading a paper about acceleration and the author states the local coordinates of the observer (\tau,x) (for a non-uniformly accelerated observer) are specified (in relation to the inertial coordates (T,X)):

T(\tau)=\int^{\tau}\,\mathrm{d}\alpha\,[1+g(\alpha)x]\cosh{(\chi(\alpha))}
X(\tau)=\int^{\tau}\,\mathrm{d}\alpha\,[1+g(\alpha)x]\sinh{(\chi(\alpha))}

the author references another paper that then references another book by Moller (1969) but when I got that book I couldn't find the relevant section that explains these coordinates. So the above is how the inertial coordinates (T,X) are related to the local coordinates (\tau,x).

If one is just interested in the trajectory of this accelerated (non-uniformly) observer in the inertial coords (T,X) then I can see that the trajectory is:

T_{*}(\tau)=\int^{\tau}\,\mathrm{d}\alpha\,\cosh{(\chi(\alpha))}
X_{*}(\tau)=\int^{\tau}\,\mathrm{d}\alpha\,\sinh{(\chi(\alpha))}

where d\chi(\tau)/d\tau=g(\tau) and g(\tau) is the time varying proper acceleration in all of the above.

So I can see where the trajectory of this observer in the inertial coords comes from (one just has to differentiate and take the four vector product of the four acceleration to see it has the correct norm etc. But I'm trying to get my head around these local coordinates, do they correspond to the Fermi-Walker tetrad somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually it seems possible to invert these to write:

x=\frac{1}{g(\tau)}\left[\sqrt{\left(\frac{dT}{d\tau}\right)^2-\left(\frac{dX}{d\tau}\right)^2}-1\right]

I'm not sure what metric the author is using but assuming U^2=-1 along the accelerated trajectory then \sqrt{\left(\frac{dT}{d\tau}\right)^2-\left(\frac{dX}{d\tau}\right)^2}=1 then x=0 for the accelerated trajectory? so x is a good coordinate for a comoving reference frame with the observer?

------------

I also seem to find inverting to try and get \tau:

\chi(\tau)=\text{arctanh}(\frac{dX}{dT})

so given that d\chi/d\tau=g(\tau):

g(\tau)=\frac{1}{1-\left(\frac{dX}{dT}\right)^2} =\gamma^2\text{??}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top