Local interpretations of quantum mechanics

Finbar
Messages
342
Reaction score
2
I was wondering if anyone knows whether there exist strictly local interpretations of quantum mechanics. I understand that Bell's theorem tells us that any hidden variable theory must be non-local if it is to give QM. But what about other interpretations such as many worlds? It is obvious that wave function collapse is non-local so any interpretation that views this as a real process must be non-local. This is why my guess is that MW could be local since there is no physical collapse. What about decoherent histories?

Thanks,

Fin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this blog:

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3622
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Finbar, as you can see at my blog mentioned above, both MW and decoherent histories are local in a certain sense, but with a big price to pay for that.
 
Finbar said:
I was wondering if anyone knows whether there exist strictly local interpretations of quantum mechanics. I understand that Bell's theorem tells us that any hidden variable theory must be non-local if it is to give QM. But what about other interpretations such as many worlds? It is obvious that wave function collapse is non-local so any interpretation that views this as a real process must be non-local. This is why my guess is that MW could be local since there is no physical collapse. What about decoherent histories?

Thanks,

Fin.

In addition to those mentioned above, there is another important class of local interpretations: the Time Symmetric group. In these, the causal light cone extends in both directions of time. This gives the appearance of non-locality but c is still a limiting factor for propagation of effects.

Here are a couple of references to get you started on these:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1232
New Insights on Time-Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics
Yakir Aharonov, Jeff Tollaksen (2007)

http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.4348
Relational Blockworld: A Path Integral Based Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory
W.M. Stuckey, Michael Silberstein, Timothy McDevitt
 
I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
Back
Top