Logarithms/intro to logarithms (how did they the get solution?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova1203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how the solution of 7/2 is derived in logarithmic expressions involving square roots. It explains that logarithms are the inverse of exponentials, utilizing properties such as log_a(xy) = log_a(x) + log_a(y) and log_a(x^y) = y log_a(x). The example provided demonstrates that log_3(27√3) simplifies to log_3(3^(7/2)), leading to the solution of 7/2. Additionally, it clarifies that square roots can be expressed as exponents of one-half, such as √2 = 2^(1/2). This foundational understanding of logarithmic and exponential relationships is crucial for solving similar problems.
supernova1203
Messages
209
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



o59lcj.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




24lua8i.jpg



I have no idea how they came up with 7/2 as a solution...can anyone tell me how? I am not sure how logarithms and square roots work...how did they get the 1/2 exponent over the second 2? What is the train of thought required to solve a question like this??... for example

you do this...then you do that...and using that you get 7/2...can someone explain to me? in detail how they got 7/2?

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Your links don't work.
 


Try again...i re did them...and they seem to work now.
 
Looks like magic!

Do you know the "properties of exponents"? a^xa^y= a^{x+y} and (a^x)^y= a^{xy}

The logarithm is the opposite of the exponential: log_a(a^x)= x and a^{log_a(x)}= x (the technical term is "inverse") so logarithms have the opposite properties: log_a(xy)= log_a(x)+ log_a(y) and log_a(x^y)= y log_a(x)

So, for example, log_3(27\sqrt{3})= log_3(3^3(3^{1/2})= log_3(3^{3+ 1/2})= log_3(3^{7/2})= 7/2
That, as well as, log_2(8\sqrt{2})= log_2(2^3(2^{1/2})= log_2(2^{3+ 1/2})= log_2(2^{7/2})= 7/2
are both applications of log_a(a^x)= x. The "logarithm" and "exponential" are inverse functions so they "cancel".
 
supernova1203 said:
how did they get the 1/2 exponent over the second 2?

A notation that is used for square roots is to raise the number to the one-half power.

So the square root of two is equivalent to ##2^{\frac{1}{2}}##.
On a similar note, the cube root of two is equivalent to ##2^{\frac{1}{3}}##. (this isn't relevant for this problem, but I feel like it helps you understand the rule a little better.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top