Foundations Logic in philosophy and mathematics Textbook

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the search for a comprehensive textbook that bridges the fields of logic, mathematics, and philosophy. The individual expresses a desire for a resource that incorporates mathematical notation to enhance understanding, particularly in relation to logic. They mention previous readings, including Popper's "Logic of Science," which they find lacking from a mathematical perspective, and Russell's work, which they find difficult due to its complex notation. Recommendations include exploring introductory texts on set theory while keeping philosophical discussions minimal. Additionally, there is an interest in the historical development of mathematics during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, highlighting figures like Cantor, Hilbert, and Gödel. A suggested resource is Loveland's textbook, which may meet the criteria for a broad and mathematically oriented approach to logic.
Phylosopher
Messages
139
Reaction score
26
Hello,Lately, I have been interested in philosophy and in particular the branches of philosophy where there is a tie with mathematics and physics. From this point, I think the best branch to start studying would be the most robust one for scientists. i.e Logic.

But I am having a problem finding a textbook to read from. Mathematicians usually focus on, well "math"! While philosophers goes for the whole spectrum of logic, but without using the privilege of mathematical notation.

So I am basically searching for a broad textbook that cover Logic as whole, but includes mathematical notations as well. (So that I can link my knowledge of math with the logic).
Note: I already know introductory set theory.

Can Anyone help me finding a suitable textbook?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have Popper's Logic of Science but from a mathematical point of view, I cannot recommend it. It is basically a book which belongs to philosophy and its influence on science has to be considered critical. At least it contains the letters Einstein wrote who wasn't a fan either.

I've also searched the net for Russel's book about set theory, but it is so full of special notations, that it is hard to read. So it might be better to read about Russel than to read Russel himself.

So, all in all I have not really a good idea. If you asked for a good book in the field of popular science, I would recommend Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach. It's a good book, but it isn't meant to be scientific.

From a mathematical point of view, I would chose an introductory book on set theory, leaving the philosophical part outside. Another idea is to look for mathematical history of the late 19th and early 20th century, say 1840 - 1960, when the mathematical revolution took place (Cantor, Hilbert, Gödel). A further approach is to study the various systems and models of logic. We basically use only the predicate logic, but there are more. In how far these systems influenced or affected philosophy is beyond my knowledge. I'm a fan of Kant and not very interested in what came after.
 
  • Like
Likes Phylosopher
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K