Logic Order of All Physics- Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter T.O.E Dream
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic Physics
AI Thread Summary
To effectively learn physics, it is essential to follow a structured progression similar to that of formal academic programs. Starting with basic calculus-based classical mechanics, the next steps include calculus-based electrodynamics, optics, wave mechanics, basic thermodynamics, and special relativity. Mastery of vector calculus and differential equations is crucial before advancing to basic quantum mechanics. Following this, students typically study advanced mechanics, advanced electrodynamics, and advanced quantum mechanics, which often requires knowledge of linear algebra. Finally, statistical mechanics rounds out the foundational curriculum. While self-study is possible, the consensus emphasizes that formal education significantly aids comprehension and retention of complex concepts, making it challenging to learn physics entirely independently.
T.O.E Dream
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Can someone tell me what order someone should learn physics until they can say that they totally know physics (please don't write something like you can never learn everything in physics)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can never learn everything in physics
 
Learning everything is indeed impossible, but if you want to self-teach yourself some physics, starting with the real basics, I shall recommend:

http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theorist.html
 
I'll start off by saying that it's very rare for someone to be able to learn physics in a vacuum. Yes, it's possible, and people like Issac Newton are examples. But such people are exceptional cases, and even most of the famous physicists studied formally (in thinking of examples, Newton was the only one that came to mind, and even he had a Bachelors degree when he formulated his laws of mechanics). When you don't have a professor and the stress of grades pressuring you to study for exams and do homework, it usually just doesn't work out. But hey, maybe you're that exceptional case, so I'll just list off the order of coursework that most physics programs take you through.

Basic, calculus based classical mechanics
Basic, calculus based electrodynamics
Optics, wave mechanics, basic thermodynamics, and special relativity
(By this point you'd better have picked up vector calculus and differential equations)
Basic quantum mechanics
Advanced mechanics
Advanced electrodynamics
Advanced quantum mechanics (you'll likely need some linear algebra before this one)
Statistical mechanics

This is the absolute minimum usually required for an undergraduate degree in physics. I'd say that if you can master this material (which almost always comes by going to college and taking the courses), then you're in a position such that you can pick up textbooks or papers and start learning on your own. And even then it's hard. Maybe it's just my learning style, but even in graduate school I've learned a lot just by going to class and doing my homework.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top