Looking at reaction force on a molecular level?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the molecular mechanics of reaction forces, particularly the electrostatic interactions between objects like a stone and the Earth. It emphasizes that nature seeks equilibrium and that gravitational forces are mutual, adhering to Newton's Third Law, where two masses attract each other with equal and opposite forces. The conversation delves into atomic interactions, explaining that electron fields and atomic bonds maintain spacing between atoms, contributing to the incompressibility of solids under moderate pressures. At high pressures, interatomic spacing can decrease significantly. The origin of macroscopic reaction forces is linked to electrostatic interactions at atomic levels, particularly at contact points. The potential energy curve of molecules, such as H2, illustrates how attractive forces become repulsive as atoms approach each other, highlighting the complexity of forces in larger atoms. This repulsion is fundamental to understanding reaction forces in various materials.
briton
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain how a reaction force (for example the electrostatc force of the Earth on the stone, and the force of the stone on the earth) works on a molecular level?

what is actually happening to *repel (if it does indeed repel??) the object
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
A couple of thoughts to keep in mind:

1. Nature tends toward equilibrium - or lowest possible energy state.

2. Gravity is mutual - two masses attract each other - equal and opposite. As Gokul corrected me, "Force is a binary operator, F = f(m1,m2). The field due to a more massive object is greater. The force exerted by the Earth on the moon equals the force exerted by the moon on Earth - Newton's Third." Electric/magnetic forces are also mutual - attraction between opposite charges/poles and repulsion between like charges/poles.

briton, as for the earth/stone system, to what electrostatic force do you refer?

Going to the atomic level, the electron fields (and the atomic bonds they form) around the nuclei maintain spacing between nuclei/atoms. Solids are relatively incompressible - i.e. low strains at moderate pressures/compressive stresses (MPa range) - but at high pressures (GPa) interatomic spacing will decrease substantially.

As for measuring atomic forces, this can be done by atomic force microprobes, which have been developed by companies such as IBM. As far as I know, AFM's are applied under vacuum conditions.

High pressures on materials in the laboratory can be applied by diamond anvils - see examples at - http://hannahsmac.magnet.fsu.edu/F_S/high_pressure.html

http://www.crystal.vt.edu/crystal/dac.html

http://www.hpdo.com/ (website of High Pressure Diamond Optics, Inc. )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The origin of a macroscopic reaction force is indeed in the electrostatic interactions between electrons and nucleii of the surface atoms at the points of contact.

The idea is encapsulated in the potential energy curve of a H2 molecule. Below is a plot of the potential energy of a pair of H-atoms as a function of their separation.

[PLAIN]http://epswww.unm.edu/facstaff/zsharp/bio1_files/image008.gif [/PLAIN]

As atoms get close, the potential keeps decreasing (a negative potential indicates an attractive force) till it reaches a minimum. As the separation decreases beyond this, the potential increases till it starts becoming positive (top left portion of curve). Now the force between the atoms is repulsive.


For larger atoms than hydrogen, the PE curve is more complex, with several alternating positive and negative regions. Each of these positive regions represents a repulsion. This repulsion is the basis of the reaction force.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top