Looking for a hint on a stats proof

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bennyska
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Stats
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equality Pr(Union i=1 to n A_i) = Sum i=1 to n Pr(B_i) for infinite sequences of events A and B. The sequence B is defined as B_1=A_1, B_2=A_1cA_2, and B_3=A_1cA_2cA_3, where c denotes the complement. The user expresses confidence in the truth of the statement but seeks assistance in formalizing the proof and understanding the notation involved, particularly the meaning of "Sum B_i" and the concept of adding sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory, specifically unions and intersections
  • Familiarity with probability theory and notation
  • Knowledge of infinite sequences and their properties
  • Basic skills in mathematical proof techniques, including induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction for proofs
  • Learn about set operations and their implications in probability theory
  • Explore the concept of complements in set theory and their applications
  • Review the definitions and properties of infinite sequences in probability
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in statistics, mathematicians focusing on probability proofs, and anyone interested in understanding the connections between set theory and probability.

bennyska
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
so I'm somewhat new to statistics proofs, but this one is for the most part a sets proof, which i can do. I'm having trouble connecting them.
(c = complement)(AB = A intersect B)

Let A_1, A_2... be any infinite sequence of events, and let B_1, B_2... be another infinite sequence defined as B_1=A_1, B_2=A_1cA_2, B_3=A_1cA_2cA_3 and so on.
Prove that Pr(Union i=1 to n A_i) = Sum i=1 to n Pr(B_i).
(sorry if that notation is hard to understand)

So I've convinced myself that this is true. I see if i take the union of A_i up to n, that B_i up to n is equal. Each B_i is A_i minus any previous As that intersect it. I'm just having trouble saying that in math. If I had to write a proof right now, I'd say each Sum B_i = Union A_i, so they're equal.

So yeah, if i could get some hints on where to start. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "Sum B_i" mean? Can you add sets?

I would have defined Z_k = union of A_i up to k.

Show the equality holds for k=1, and it also holds for k+1 assuming it does for k.
 
Last edited:
i have since restarted this thread over in the homework section. i do have a proof there, if you wouldn't mind taking a peek at it, see if it looks okay. the thread has the same name as this one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K