Looking for an explanation of a simple Lipshitz condition

dynamicskillingme
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


gif.gif

Has solution
gif.gif

It then goes on to state the solution blows up at
gif.gif
, which I understand.

My issue is when I do the solution I get
gif.gif


(Working)
gif.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dynamicskillingme said:
\dot{y} = y^2
y = yt + c ; for t = 0

You seem to be treating y as if it were a constant instead of a function of t.
We can't assume \int y dt = (y)(t) = yt because, in this problem the antiderivative needed is \int y(t) dt where y(t) is an unknown function.

For example, if y(t) = e^t then \int y(t) dt = e^t + c \ne (y(t))(t).
 
If you could humour me as an engineer having to take a maths course and is struggling to remember concepts taught along time ago, How could I prove their answer, or what should I read up on to be able to show this proof?
 
dynamicskillingme said:

Homework Statement


gif.gif

Has solution
gif.gif

It then goes on to state the solution blows up at
gif.gif
, which I understand.

My issue is when I do the solution I get
gif.gif


(Working)
gif.gif

Wrong: ##y## is a function of ##t## because, after all, you have ##\dot{y} = dy/dt## in your equation to start with! So, from ##dy/dt = y^2## you have
\frac{dy}{y^2} = dt \: \Longrightarrow -y^{-1} = t + c,
or
\frac{1}{y} = -c-t \: \Longrightarrow y = \frac{-1}{t+c}
Set ##c = -1/y_0## and see what you get.

Anyway, if all you want to do is to see why ##y = y(t) = y_0/(1-y_0 t)## is a solution, just plug it into your differential equation ##dy/dt = y^2## and see if it works.
 
  • Like
Likes dynamicskillingme
dynamicskillingme said:
How could I prove their answer, or what should I read up on to be able to show this proof?

Does the problem simply want to you show that ## y(t) = \frac{y0}{1 - y0 t} ## is a solution ? You do that by substituting that function in for ## y ## in the differential equation. (Of course you also have to substitute the derivative of ## \frac{y0}{1 - y0 t}## in for ##\dot{y}## , which means remembering enough calculus to compute that derivative ).When you substitute a solution into a differential equation, the equation should become an identity - i.e. the two sides should be the same function when you simplify things.Solving differential equations when you aren't given a solution, often involves guessing it. If you have to find the solution by yourself, start by reviewing your knowledge of derivatives with emphasis on noting how derivatives of a function y can be expressed in terms of the original function y.

For example:

## \dot{y} = 5y## corresponds to the derivative of ## e^{5t} ## is ## 5 e^{5t} ##.

Using "## D ##" to denote the operation of taking a derivative, ## De^{kt} = k e^{kt} ##. So when you are asked to solve a differential equation ## \dot{y} = k y ## (where ## k ## is a constant) you should be able to guess the answer is an exponential function.Ray Vickson illustrated the technique of solving a "separable" differential equation. You can find videos on the web that explain that technique in detail.
 
  • Like
Likes dynamicskillingme
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top