No, no; I do not believe those gave the correct results. The job name or title, and description said, "Psychic", but the educational requirements indicated Physics.Tom.G said:
symbolipoint said:
. Humor doesn't seem to make it thru those tiny Internet wires.symbolipoint said:
Tom.G said:
symbolipoint said:
Tom.G said:Guess I need to insert more
I bet nobody has these problems on PsychicsForums.com.Stephen Tashi said:
No . I am looking at the question and the article as seriously as I can. The article (job advertisement) appears to be an attempt to attract a Physics faculty person (adjunt) but part of the job advertisment had misspelled Physics as Psychics.Stephen Tashi said:
How were they supposed to know this would be so embarrassing? You'd have to be some kind of mind read--ohhhhhhh...ZapperZ said:
Be able to determine the state of one entangled particle while leaving the other one undetermined?nuuskur said:
Made me think of something I read in Scientific American a decade or so ago. Yakir Aharonov, "The future can only affect the present if there is room to write the influence off as a mistake.”nuuskur said:How would a fortune teller be any good to teach physics?
jim hardy said:
?The connection between psychics and physics is that both deal with understanding and interpreting the world around us. Physics is a scientific field that uses empirical evidence and mathematical models to explain natural phenomena, while psychics claim to have extrasensory abilities to perceive and interpret information beyond the physical world. The overlap between these two fields is often debated and studied by scientists.
This is a difficult question to answer definitively, as the concept of a "reputable" psychic is subjective and controversial. Some may argue that anyone who claims to have psychic abilities is not a legitimate teacher of physics, as their beliefs may conflict with scientific principles. Others may argue that there are reputable psychics who also have a strong understanding of physics and can effectively teach it. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to research and evaluate the credentials and teaching style of any potential psychic teacher.
There is no scientific evidence to suggest that learning from a psychic can improve one's understanding of physics. In fact, relying on psychic abilities to understand scientific concepts may hinder one's ability to think critically and objectively. It is important to seek out reputable and evidence-based sources when learning about physics.
It is unlikely that a psychic without a scientific background would be able to effectively teach physics. Scientific principles and theories are based on rigorous research and evidence, which requires a thorough understanding of the subject matter. Without a scientific background, it is unlikely that a person would have the necessary knowledge and skills to teach physics accurately and effectively.
No, there is currently no scientific evidence to support the claims of psychics teaching physics. The scientific community does not recognize psychic abilities as legitimate or proven, and there is no evidence to suggest that learning from a psychic can enhance one's understanding of physics. It is important to rely on reputable and evidence-based sources when learning about any scientific subject.