Looking for Psychics to Teach Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a job advertisement from Kennedy-King College that humorously mislabels a position for teaching physics as one for teaching psychics. Participants explore the implications of this error, the nature of the advertisement, and engage in light-hearted banter regarding the intersection of physics and psychic abilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Humor-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express surprise and embarrassment over the job advertisement's error, noting that it mislabels "Physics" as "Psychics."
  • Others humorously suggest that the job might be for teaching physics to psychics, indicating a playful interpretation of the mistake.
  • Several participants question how a psychic could effectively teach physics, raising speculative scenarios about the abilities of a fortune teller in a physics context.
  • A participant recalls a humorous anecdote about a department labeled "Physics and Astrology," suggesting a historical precedent for such mix-ups.
  • Some contributors speculate on the possibility of multiple authors or templates being involved in the job ad's creation, leading to the confusion.
  • One participant references a scientific article discussing the intersection of neuroscience and quantum physics, hinting at a serious interpretation of spiritual experiences.
  • There is a recurring theme of sarcasm and humor throughout the thread, with participants questioning the seriousness of the job ad and the nature of the discussion itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the job advertisement contains an amusing error, but there is no consensus on the seriousness of the implications or the nature of the discussion. Multiple competing views on the relevance of psychics to teaching physics are present, and the overall tone remains light-hearted and speculative.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the intentions behind the job advertisement and the potential for miscommunication in academic settings. The discussion reflects a blend of humor and critique regarding the standards expected from educational institutions.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the intersection of humor and academia, as well as those exploring the cultural perceptions of physics and psychic phenomena, may find this discussion engaging.

ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,819
Reaction score
4,723
This is both funny and embarrassing for the institution at the same time.

https://cccconnect.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl?job=133301

I'm surprised no one from Kennedy-King college haven't double-check their job ads by now.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb, DennisN, Stephen Tashi and 2 others
Science news on Phys.org
I guess they won't hire Niels Bohr, who is claimed to have said "It is difficult to predict, especially about the future."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and berkeman
I knew they were going to advertise this job!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
A good guess is that some person, or the taleo system, MISSPELLED Physics, three times.
 
How DARE you! Of course it is correct, it passed spellcheck and stylecheck.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Tom.G said:
How DARE you! Of course it is correct, it passed spellcheck and stylecheck.
No, no; I do not believe those gave the correct results. The job name or title, and description said, "Psychic", but the educational requirements indicated Physics.
 
symbolipoint said:
No, no; I do not believe those gave the correct results.

I don't have either here, can you please run it thru and report?
 
I visited the page indicated in post #1, and read the job advertisement. The title and description discuss a desire to find a Psychic; and then the educational requirements part plainly states Master's degree in Physics or Engineering Physics. You too can visit the page and read, and make your own conclusions.
 
Guess I need to insert more :DD. Humor doesn't seem to make it thru those tiny Internet wires.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TeethWhitener
  • #10
symbolipoint said:
A good guess is that some person, or the taleo system, MISSPELLED Physics, three times.

Tom.G said:
How DARE you! Of course it is correct, it passed spellcheck and stylecheck.

symbolipoint said:
I visited the page indicated in post #1, and read the job advertisement. The title and description discuss a desire to find a Psychic; and then the educational requirements part plainly states Master's degree in Physics or Engineering Physics. You too can visit the page and read, and make your own conclusions.

Indeed, there is no misspelling. It is to teach Physics to Psychics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
  • #11
Tom.G said:
Guess I need to insert more :DD. Humor doesn't seem to make it thru those tiny Internet wires.

Maybe @symbolipoint is meeting sarcasm with sarcasm - ?

Maybe I'm being sarcastic by suggesting that.
 
  • #12
Stephen Tashi said:
Maybe @symbolipoint is meeting sarcasm with sarcasm - ?

Maybe I'm being sarcastic by suggesting that.
I bet nobody has these problems on PsychicsForums.com.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and TeethWhitener
  • #13
Stephen Tashi said:
Maybe @symbolipoint is meeting sarcasm with sarcasm - ?

Maybe I'm being sarcastic by suggesting that.
No . I am looking at the question and the article as seriously as I can. The article (job advertisement) appears to be an attempt to attract a Physics faculty person (adjunt) but part of the job advertisment had misspelled Physics as Psychics.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
How would a fortune teller be any good to teach physics? :wideeyed:
 
  • #15
I seem to recall an envelop taped to the office door of my undergraduate faculty office addressed to the "Department of Physics and Astrology." Perhaps some of their graduates would be well suited for this job. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, Charles Link and Ibix
  • #16
ZapperZ said:
I'm surprised no one from Kennedy-King college haven't double-check their job ads by now.
How were they supposed to know this would be so embarrassing? You'd have to be some kind of mind read--ohhhhhhh...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link and Ibix
  • #17
We see this type of "mistake" rather frequently on PF. For example:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/40-to-70c-degrees-special-refrigerator.904876/#post-5720972
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...on-why-are-we-still-sick.937728/#post-5937082
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/thanks-for-welcoming-me-to-your-thought-bubble.802312/#post-5036538

etc... etc.

While they are amusing, this type of error is not surprising when it occurs here. However, we hold educational institutions to a higher standard, because they are supposed to educate the masses and so, should know better. So something like this done by an educational institution is rather embarrassing, especially when it has been left uncorrected for so long. Mistakes happen and we can overlook something small like this. However, mistakes left uncorrected is ignorant negligence.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Choppy, symbolipoint and Charles Link
  • #19
Should we recommend John Hagelin?
 
  • #20
nuuskur said:
How would a fortune teller be any good to teach physics?
Be able to determine the state of one entangled particle while leaving the other one undetermined?
Receive information from the other side of the globe, or Universe, without using any artefacts?
Be aware of the understanding each student has of the material presented?

(Hmm... it seems conjecture has no limits):wink:
 
  • #21
nuuskur said:
How would a fortune teller be any good to teach physics? :wideeyed:
Made me think of something I read in Scientific American a decade or so ago. Yakir Aharonov, "The future can only affect the present if there is room to write the influence off as a mistake.”
 
  • #22
Think they might be serious ?

Neuro-ontological interpretation of spiritual experiences.
Frecska E1, Luna LE.
Author information

Abstract
The prevailing neuroscientific paradigm considers information processing within the central nervous system as occurring through hierarchically organized and interconnected neural networks. The hierarchy of neural networks doesn't end at the neuroaxonal level; it incorporates subcellular mechanisms as well. When the size of the hierarchical components reaches the nanometer range and the number of elements exceeds that of the neuroaxonal system, an interface emerges for a possible transition between neurochemical and quantum physical events. "Signal nonlocality", accessed by means of quantum entanglement is an essential feature of the quantum physical domain. The presented interface may imply that some manifestations of altered states of consciousness, unconscious/conscious shifts have quantum origin with significant psychosomatic implications.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17211049
 
  • #23
(do i need a 'i'm not serious' emoticon ?)

old jim
 
  • #24
jim hardy said:
(do i need a 'i'm not serious' emoticon ?)
:wink:?
 
  • #25
Y'all welcome Madame Zelda to the faculty.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
655
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K