Loop Feynman diagram contributions to correlation functions

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
Given a quantum field theory whose potential is given by



$$V(\phi) = g \frac{\phi^3}{3!} + \lambda \frac{\phi^4}{4!}$$



Find all connected one and two-loop graphs (to do so you will need to find all symmetry factors involved) which contribute to



\begin{equation*}

\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle, \qquad \langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \phi(x_3)\rangle

\end{equation*}
Relevant Equations
N/A
My understanding of the n-correlation function is

\begin{equation*}
\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) ... \phi(x_n)\rangle = i \Delta_F (x_1-x_2-...-x_n)
\end{equation*}

Where ##\Delta_F## is known as the Feynman propagator (in Mathematics is better known as Green's function).

Let us analyze ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle## first. Conventionally, the ##\Delta_F(x_1−x_2)## propagator is drawn as a line

dcohiosjocjpcfjofvs.png


OK. But then I see that the second contribution is given by a diagram with a 'bubble' in between, with a symmetry factor of ##2## attached to it

xjdjcsdpcjopcs.png

Regarding the symmetry factor ##S=2## attached to the bubble diagram.

This is how I approached it (highly inspired by the accepted answer here) : Let's start with the external leg on the left. There are two possibilities for this external leg to attach: it can attach to either ##z## or ##w##. The right external leg is thus left with only one possibility. Hence we have a ##2 \times 1## factor. We could start from right to left instead so, by the same token, we pick up another ##2 \times 1## factor. The upper internal leg can either attach to ##z## or ##w## while the lower is left with one option only; we hence pick up a ##2 \times 1## factor. We could start with the lower internal leg instead so, by the same token, we pick up another ##2 \times 1## factor (still thinking about the argument used for the internal legs...).

Overall, the Dyson series gives us a ##1/2!## factor and the two vertices give ##1/(2!2!)## so the symmetry factor I get is

$$\frac{2\times 1 \times 2\times 1 \times 2\times 1 \times 2\times 1}{2!2!2!}=2$$
My doubts are

1) Why does this 'bubble' contribution emerge?

2) What are the specific Feynman rules that allow us to write down all contributions?

Once I fully understand how ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle## works, I should be able to show all contributions for ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \phi(x_3) \rangle##

@vanhees71 @Gaussian97 , might you have time to discuss this one? :smile:

Thank you :biggrin:

Source: Osborn notes

PS: ##\phi^3+\phi^4## theory was discussed in this enlightening thread.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Somehow the time-ordering symbol is missing. The Feynman diagrams are just a very clever notation to evaluate the functional derivatives wrt. the external source ##J(x)## or, equivalently, the application of the Wick theorem to evaluate vacuum expectation values of time-ordered field-operator products in the operator formalism. In this way you can also find a safe way to get the symmetry factors. For you one-loop contribution of the four-point function you start with drawing the two three-leg vertices and the two external points. Now you count in how many ways you connect these elements to the diagram of the given topology: for the first external point you have 6 possibilities to connect it with one of the legs. For the 2nd external point you have 3 remaining possibilities. Then you have 2 possibilities to connect one of the legs of one vertex with one of the other. The remaining connection is then unique. So the overall factor is 6*3*2/(3! 3! 2)=1/2.
 
@vanhees71 my apologies for the late reply.

vanhees71 said:
For you one-loop contribution of the four-point function you start with drawing the two three-leg vertices and the two external points. Now you count in how many ways you connect these elements to the diagram of the given topology: for the first external point you have 6 possibilities to connect it with one of the legs. For the 2nd external point you have 3 remaining possibilities. Then you have 2 possibilities to connect one of the legs of one vertex with one of the other. The remaining connection is then unique. So the overall factor is 6*3*2/(3! 3! 2)=1/2.

I have been studying this particular case (##\phi^3 \ \& \ \phi^4## combined) and realized I lack of the basic understanding on how the whole machinery works.

So let me step back, discuss and understand the simplest case I could find: the two-point function.

I want to understand how to construct the Feynman rules for this case (the first non-trivial contribution has been shown in the OP: a bubble diagram with two external legs)

We start off by defining the functional integral

\begin{equation*}
Z[J] = \int d[\phi] e^{iS[\phi] + i\int d^d x J(x) \phi(x)}
\end{equation*}

Which can be rewritten as

\begin{align*}
Z[J] &= \exp\left(\frac{i}{2} \int d^d x d^d y \frac{\delta}{\delta \phi(x)} \Delta_F (x-y) \frac{\delta}{\delta \phi(y)}\right) \times \\
&\times \exp\left( i \int d^d x (-V(\phi(x))+J(x)\phi(x))\right) \Big|_{\phi=0}
\end{align*}

Then Osborn says "expand this to get the perturbation expansion", from which you can construct the Feynman rules. I am trying to see how.

Let's sketch it. If we were to expand it we would get ##Z[J] = e^xe^y = 1+ xy + \frac 1 4 (xy)^2 + ...## but how does this lead to construct the Feynman diagrams?

PS: I am following (the attached) Osborn notes, section 2.2
 
Alright, I think I will post a more basic conceptual question and then come back to this particular exercise :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top