Why Are Two Indices Used for the Generators of Lorentz and Poincare Groups?

Bobhawke
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question here: I was going through my notes and I noticed that the generators of both these groups are labeled two indices. I was wondering if there is any particular reason for this, since it seems to me that one index would work perfectly well.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no more reason to attach 2 indices to a Lorentz transformation than to an ordinary 3D rotation, or a matrix in general. A rotation will be specified by angles between one axis (first index) and another axis (second index). If it pleases you, you can store them in a vector, but that is clumsy.
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why are discontinuous Lorentz transformations excluded from the Poincare group?
Replies
27
Views
4K
I Lorentz Group: Tensor Representation Explained
Replies
4
Views
2K
What are the representations and generators of Lorentz and Poincare Groups?
Replies
23
Views
6K
I Why are direct sums of Lorentz group representations important in physics?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Unitary Representations of Lorentz/Poincare Group
Replies
21
Views
3K
Can we do other than Lorentz (or Poincare) Transformation in SR?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Discussing the mathematical formalism of generators (Lorentz Group)
Replies
31
Views
5K
I Lorentz Transformation: Premises + Derivation
Replies
5
Views
2K
I How do Tensors "work" in relation to linear algebraic objects?
Replies
7
Views
264
I Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?
Replies
35
Views
516

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top