Lorentz Contraction and Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Lorentz contraction in the context of a particle accelerator. The user calculates the Lorentz contracted length of the accelerator in the rest frame of an electron, concluding that it measures 4 cm. A key point of confusion is the absence of the speed of light (c) in the Lorentz contraction equation used, which is clarified by noting that in certain unit systems, c is set to 1. This simplification leads to the equations for energy and length contraction being expressed without explicitly including c. The user gains clarity on the relationship between the equations and the use of natural units in relativity.
fdsa1234
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I already know the solution to this problem, but I'm not sure exactly why it works out the way it does, so I'm looking for an explanation.

Homework Statement


A particle accelerator accelerates electrons at 40 GeV in a pipe 2 miles (3218.69 metres) long, but only a few cm wide. How long is the accelerator in the rest frame of an electron with the given energy?

Homework Equations


##L' = L*\sqrt{(1 - V^2)}##

##E = \frac{m}{\sqrt{(1 - V^2)}}##

The Attempt at a Solution


L' is the Lorentz contracted length of the accelerator in the electron's rest frame; using the two equations with 0.51 MeV as the mass of the electron, I get ##\sqrt{(1 - V^2)} = \frac{m}{E} = \frac{(0.51 MeV)}{40 GeV} = 1.2 * 10^-5##

Then, ##L' = 1.2 * 10^-5 * 3218.69 = 4 cm##

This is the correct solution. My question is, why are the ##\sqrt{(1 - V^2)}## terms not ##\sqrt{(1 - \frac{V^2}{c^2})}##? I thought that the Lorentz contraction equation is ##L' = L*\gamma##, where ##\gamma## is ##\sqrt{(1 - \frac{V^2}{c^2})}##. What's the explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is very common in relativity to use units where c = 1. This explains why it does not appear in your expressions for length contraction as well as in your expression for the total energy.
 
Ah, so ##E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}## simply becomes ##E = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1 - V^2}}##. Now I see it. Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top