Lorentz contraction and simultaneous detection of the ends of the moving rod?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the length contraction formula in special relativity, specifically examining whether the derivation requires simultaneous detection of the ends of a moving rod. Participants explore the implications of simultaneity in both relativistic and non-relativistic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 presents a derivation of the length contraction formula and questions whether it assumes simultaneous detection of the ends of the moving rod.
  • Post 2 asserts that the length contraction formula requires simultaneous detection of the ends of the rod and questions the expectation of this working in special relativity, given that it is valid in non-relativistic physics.
  • Post 3 reiterates the point about simultaneous detection and provides a detailed explanation involving two different reference frames and measurements of velocity, emphasizing that the detection of the ends of the rod occurs at different times in one of the experiments.
  • Post 4 expresses difficulty in following the discussion and does not engage with the technical details presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the necessity of simultaneous detection in the derivation of the length contraction formula. Some participants argue that it is a requirement, while others question this assumption based on the context of special relativity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of simultaneity in different reference frames and the implications for deriving relativistic effects. There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the derivation and the interpretations of simultaneity.

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
988
Reaction score
1
It is known that with the formula that accounts for the time dilation effect in hand we can derive directly the formula that accounts for the length contraction effect:
L0/Dt=L/(Dt)0 (1)
where L0 and (Dt)0 are proper length and proper time intervals, L and Dt representing measured length and coodinate time interval. From (1)
L=L0(1-V2/c2)1/2 (2)
Is there a special reason (Ockham's razor) for deriving (2) involving the Lorentz transformations and to perform a simultaneous detection of the space coordinates of the moving rod?
I find in the literature of the subject derivations of (2) considering that the two ends are detected at different times. Does the simple derivation (2) involve simultaneous detection of the ends of the rod?
Thanks for your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Eq. (2) requires simultaneous detection of the ends of the rod.
The probable motivation for this is that simultaneous detection works in non-relativistic physics. Why should it be expected to work in SR?
 
clem said:
Your Eq. (2) requires simultaneous detection of the ends of the rod.
The probable motivation for this is that simultaneous detection works in non-relativistic physics. Why should it be expected to work in SR?

Thanks for your answer. Let K0 be standard synchronized clocks located along the x-axis of the I inertial reference frame. Let K'0 a clock of the I' inertial reference frame located at its origin O' moving with velocity V relative to I. Observers from I measure the velocity of the moving clock using a rod of proper length L and the clocks K0 and K located at the two ends of the rod respectively reading t=0 and t respectively when the moving clock passes in front of them. By definition the speed of the moving clock is
V=L0/(t-0) (1)
measured as a quotient between a proper length and a coordinate time interval.
In a second experiment an observer R' located at the origin O' of I' uses clock K' as a wrist watch and measures the velocity of the moving rod used in the previous experiment. He detects the presence of the moving rod in front of him during a proper time interval (t'-0) measured as a difference between the readings of his wrist watch when the two ends of the rod cross his location respectively and measures a length L of the rod different from L0. By definition
V=L/(t'-0) (2)
the detection of the two ends being not simultaneous!
From (1) and (2) and taking into account the formula that accounts for the time dilation effect we receover the formula that accounts for the length contraction effect
L=L0(1-V2/c2)1/2.
 
Sorry, I am better at algebra than lengthy discussion. I can't follow your discussion and don't have time to try. I hope someone else can help you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 166 ·
6
Replies
166
Views
15K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K