Lorentz force between two moving charges

AI Thread Summary
Two charges moving perpendicularly to each other exhibit a scenario where the force on one charge appears zero while the other experiences a non-zero force, seemingly violating Newton's third law. This discrepancy arises because one must consider the total electromagnetic force rather than just the magnetic component. Instantaneous forces in electromagnetic interactions do not always adhere to Newton's third law, but momentum conservation remains valid when accounting for the electromagnetic field's momentum. An example illustrates this with two wires, where one wire feels an immediate force from the other’s magnetic field before the influence of its own current reaches the first wire. Understanding the role of the electromagnetic field's momentum is crucial to resolving these apparent contradictions.
Universeer
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Two charges are moving mutually perpendicular to each other in space with constant velocities.

The moment one charge crosses over the line of path of second charge the force on 1st charge (located just behind the 2nd charge moving away from it) appear to be zero (Magnetic field due to 2nd charge along its line of path is zero) while force on second charge due to 1st is non zero!
That violates Newton's 3rd law.

What am i missing here?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be easier to see what is going on if you work in a frame in which one of the particles is at rest. Compare with the frame in which the other is at rest.
 
  • Like
Likes Universeer
Universeer said:
Summary: Lorentz force between moving Charges, violates Newton's 3rd law.

Two charges are moving mutually perpendicular to each other in space with constant velocities.

The moment one charge crosses over the line of path of second charge the force on 1st charge (located just behind the 2nd charge moving away from it) appear to be zero (Magnetic field due to 2nd charge along its line of path is zero) while force on second charge due to 1st is non zero!
That violates Newton's 3rd law.

What am i missing here?
1) You have to look at the total EM-force, not just the magnetic component.

2) Newton's 3rd law in the sense of instantaneous forces in fact doesn't always apply for EM-interactions. But it does apply in the more general sense of momentum conservation, if you account for the momentum in the EM-field.
 
A.T. said:
2) Newton's 3rd law in the sense of instantaneous forces in fact doesn't always apply for EM-interactions. But it does apply in the more general sense of momentum conservation, if you account for the momentum in the EM-field.

Can you Give an example?
I'll look for total EM force part

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Universeer said:
Can you Give an example?
Two wires, one carrying a current and one not. Turn on the current in the "off" wire. It immediately feels a force from the magnetic field of the other wire, but it takes finite time for the magnetic field from the new current to reach the other wire. If you don't account for the momentum carried by the field you get a short period where one wire is accelerating and the other isn't.

It's analogous to me throwing a ball to you. If you forget about the momentum of the ball then my reaction to throwing the ball and your reaction to catching it both apparently violate momentum conservation. But that's because you forgot about the momentum of the "force carrier".
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top