Lorentz force -> Current in a gradient field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of error currents in a rotating gradiometer utilizing a superconducting loop, where the current is proportional to the magnetic field gradient. The user, Pogo, investigates the impact of the Lorentz force on electron velocities within the loop, encountering non-physical results during integration. Specifically, Pogo identifies a persistent current due to a 1/omega term and a time-dependent ramp term. The ramp issue has been resolved, but the challenge of velocity dependence remains unresolved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz force and its implications in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with superconducting materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Basic principles of gradiometry and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of Lorentz force in rotating systems
  • Explore superconducting loop configurations and their effects on current flow
  • Learn about error analysis techniques in gradiometer measurements
  • Examine the relationship between magnetic field gradients and induced currents
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers working in the fields of electromagnetism, superconductivity, and precision measurement systems, particularly those involved in gradiometry and error analysis in rotating systems.

Pogo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is doing my nut in. I'm looking at causes of errors in a rotating gradiometer. It uses a loop of superconductor formed so that the current in the loop is proportional to the gradient of the magnetic field threading the loop.

I think that an error current will arise due to the Lorentz force acting on the charges in the loop as it rotates in a field with a gradient. I'm approaching the problem by calculating the velocity of the electrons in each vertical arm of the loop, then summing.

To calculate the electron velocity, I have to integrate the acceleration due to the Lorentz force. When I integrate, I get two non-physical results. The first is a 1/omega term that cancels the omega term in the tangential velocity. That means that the current that was caused by the velocity persists when the velocity is zero. The second is a ramp term that arises from the integration. Electron velocity (current) is proportional to time which is again non-physical)

I'd be happy to provide diagrams and answer further questions, but I don't want to lead anyone down the same wrong path (if it is wrong) to get the same answers.

Would someone like to look at this with me?

Cheers;

Pogo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Further to this, I have been able to eliminate the second problem, the ramp, because the individual currents oppose, so one ramp cancels another. Now, if the velocity dependence would reappear...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K