Lorentz Transformation - Clock

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the relationship between the time period of a moving clock and that of a stationary clock using the Lorentz Transformation equations, a topic in the realm of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Lorentz Transformation equations, particularly focusing on the substitution of variables and the implications of the clock's position in different reference frames. There are attempts to manipulate the equations to express time in terms of the Lorentz factor and velocity.

Discussion Status

The conversation has progressed through various attempts to simplify the equations, with some participants offering corrections and guidance on substitutions. There is an ongoing exploration of whether further simplification is possible, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of deriving a specific relationship without providing complete solutions, and there are indications of confusion regarding notation and variable substitution.

CGM
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the Lorentz Transformation equations to derive the formula relating the time period of a moving clock to that of a stationary clock

Homework Equations


X'=y(X-vt)
Y'=Y
Z'=Z
t'=y(t-vx/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


t'=1/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2) . (t-vx/c^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CGM said:

Homework Statement


Use the Lorentz Transformation equations to derive the formula relating the time period of a moving clock to that of a stationary clock

Homework Equations


X'=y(X-vt)
Y'=Y
Z'=Z
t'=y(t-vx/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


t'=1/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2) . (t-vx/c^2)

You're almost there. If the clock is at rest in the primed coordinate system, that means that its location as a function of time can be chosen to be X' = 0. So using the first equation from your "Relevant equations", you can solve for x in terms of t. Plug that into your equation.
 
stevendaryl said:
You're almost there. If the clock is at rest in the primed coordinate system, that means that its location as a function of time can be chosen to be X' = 0. So using the first equation from your "Relevant equations", you can solve for x in terms of t. Plug that into your equation.
So, t'=yt?
 
CGM said:
So, t'=yt?

How did you get that? Take your equation, t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and replace x by v t.
 
stevendaryl said:
How did you get that? Take your equation, t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and replace x by v t.
Never mind I did something silly.
So 0=y(x-vt) => x=vt

t'=y(t-(v/t)^2 . t)
 
CGM said:
Never mind I did something silly.
So 0=y(x-vt) => x=vt

t'=y(t-(v/t)^2 . t)

I'm afraid you did something silly again. If you start with t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and substitute x=vt, you get: t' = \gamma (t - \frac{v^2 t}{c^2}). Now factor out a factor of t from the right-hand side, and remember what \gamma is.
 
stevendaryl said:
I'm afraid you did something silly again. If you start with t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and substitute x=vt, you get: t' = \gamma (t - \frac{v^2 t}{c^2}). Now factor out a factor of t from the right-hand side, and remember what \gamma is.
Yes that's what I said, maybe my notation is confusing.

t'=yt-((v/c)^2)t
t'=t(y-(v/c)^2)

Is this the answer or is there more simplification to be done?
 
CGM said:
Yes that's what I said, maybe my notation is confusing.

t'=yt-((v/c)^2)t
t'=t(y-(v/c)^2)

Is this the answer or is there more simplification to be done?

No, you have the expression

t' = \gamma (t - (v/c)^2 t)

Factor out t to get:

t' = \gamma t (1 - (v/c)^2)

Now, if you remember what the definition of \gamma is, you can write 1-(v/c)^2 = 1/\gamma^2
 
stevendaryl said:
No, you have the expression

t' = \gamma (t - (v/c)^2 t)

Factor out t to get:

t' = \gamma t (1 - (v/c)^2)

Now, if you remember what the definition of \gamma is, you can write 1-(v/c)^2 = 1/\gamma^2
Ah yes, I see my mistake. Thank you.

t'=t/y
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K