Lorentz transformation for an approaching observer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Lorentz transformation, particularly in the context of an observer approaching another object. Participants are exploring the implications of the Lorentz factor and the treatment of velocity in the transformation equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correctness of the Lorentz transformation formula, specifically regarding the sign of velocity and its implications. There are attempts to clarify whether a negative velocity affects the formula and discussions about the absence of sign changes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing links for further reading and expressing gratitude for helpful insights. There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the sign of velocity in the context of the Lorentz transformation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the application of the Lorentz transformation, particularly in relation to the sign of velocity, indicating a need for further clarification on this aspect.

sukmeov
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Let O and O' be observers both moving along the x-axis at constant velocity. Assume O and O' meet at the origin. Suppose also that O' moves towards O with relative velocity v. O reference frame has coordinates (x,t) and O' reference frame has coordinates (x',t') What is the Lorentz transformation for the two coordinate frames. ( I only care about the relationship between the time coordinates)
Relevant Equations
Lorentz transform for positive velocity: t' = Lorentz factor * (1-v/c)t
I think this should be t'= Lorentz factor* (1+v/c)t, but that doesn't make sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many thanks. So there is no sign change in the formula, even if v is negative? Also it's not a nickname it's my surname.
 
sukmeov said:
Many thanks. So there is no sign change in the formula, even if v is negative?

You're right that ##v## can indeed be positive or negative; that constitutes the sign change. There was actually a thread about this a short while ago: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/lorentz-boost-speed-or-velocity.988183/

sukmeov said:
Also it's not a nickname it's my surname.

:eek:

I don't know what to say... goodbye PF it's been nice knowing you all :doh:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sukmeov
Very helpful. Thank you.

Ukan Sukmeov.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
I KNEW it! :mad:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sukmeov

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
900
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K