I Lorentz transformation of the Gravitational constant

Dilema
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Since force is transformed via: F'x= Fx ; F'y= Fy/ ϒ; F'z=Fz/ ϒ

(F' is the force related to the moving frame, F is the force on the rest frame and ϒ=1/√1-v2/c2 ).I expect that G (Gravitational constant) will be transformed between moving and rest frame in order to satisfy force transformation since

F=-Gm1m2/r2Can you please refer me to a paper or textbook on that specific topic?It is posable to see that substituting the mass Lorentz transformation m=moϒ and Lorentz-FitzGerald's contraction - ro/ϒ without applying a transformation on G, do not settle the force to get the force transformation like. Instead it gets F'=-Gm1m2 ϒ3/r2. Namely F'=F ϒ3.Can you please refer me to a paper or textbook on that specific topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newtonian gravity is not compatible with relativity.
 
As Dale says, you can't tweak Newtonian gravity to make it work in relativity. The instantaneous action at a distance implicit in Newton's theory violates the "nothing travels faster than light" rule of relativity.

If you want to understand relativistic gravity you need to learn general relativity. Sean Carroll's lecture notes are a good free online place to start.
 
Dilema said:
force is transformed

In relativity, gravity is not a force, so this transformation law doesn't apply to gravity.
 
PeterDonis said:
In relativity, gravity is not a force, so this transformation law doesn't apply to gravity.
He could however have made the same question about Coulomb's constant. The answer being that Coulomb's law is not consistent with relativity except for in the case of a stationary field source.
 
Orodruin said:
He could however have made the same question about Coulomb's constant.

Yes, fair point.
 
PeterDonis said:
Yes, fair point.
This makes me think of the alt-text of this XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1489/
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis and Ibix
Ibix said:
As Dale says, you can't tweak Newtonian gravity to make it work in relativity. The instantaneous action at a distance implicit in Newton's theory violates the "nothing travels faster than light" rule of relativity.

If you want to understand relativistic gravity you need to learn general relativity. Sean Carroll's lecture notes are a good free online place to start.
And yet the escape velocity from a black hole is given by the application of Newton law c=(GM/r)^0.5. r is Schwarzschild radius. Newton's law is good enough for small mass. Apparently, back hols turn to be small mass compared to galaxies.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Dilema said:
And yet the escape velocity from a black hole is given by the application of Newton law c=(GM/r)^0.5. r is Schwarzschild radius. Newton's law is good enough for small mass. Apparently, back hols turn to be small mass compared to galaxies.
The formula is the same, but ##r## is not the same. And escape velocity from the "surface" of a black hole is a meaningless calculation since you can't escape - that alone should tell you that you are not doing things right.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #10
Dilema said:
And yet the escape velocity from a black hole is given by the application of Newton law c=(GM/r)^0.5. r is Schwarzschild radius. Newton's law is good enough for small mass. Apparently, back hols turn to be small mass compared to galaxies.
This is a common misconception. Just because the numerical value of where you would have Newtonian escape velocity equal to c happens to be the same as the Schwarzschild radius does not hold any deeper meaning. The concept of escape velocity is meaningless here outside of overpopularized treatments.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
  • #11
Dilema said:
And yet the escape velocity from a black hole is given by the application of Newton law c=(GM/r)^0.5. r is Schwarzschild radius. Newton's law is good enough for small mass. Apparently, back hols turn to be small mass compared to galaxies.
As others have said, this doesn't mean what you think it means. But more importantly, Newtonian gravity is more than just the escape velocity formula. You still "can't tweak Newtonian gravity to make it work in relativity" as @Ibix said.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #12
Orodruin said:
Just because the numerical value of where you would have Newtonian escape velocity equal to c happens to be the same as the Schwarzschild radius does not hold any deeper meaning.
In fact, if you construct a velocity ##v## from ##G##, a mass ##M##, and a distance ##r## then it's a trivial consequence of dimensional analysis that ##v^2\propto GM/r## with a dimensionless constant of proportionality. That the constant happens to be 2 in both cases is a coincidence, but not an especially large one.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Back
Top