Lorrentz velocity transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lorentz velocity transformation between vy and vy' in the context of special relativity. The user struggles with the relationship between velocities in different reference frames, particularly how time synchronization affects the transformation. They initially express confusion over the velocity components and the implications of an object moving in a direction parallel to the moving frame S'. Clarifications reveal that if an object is moving only in the x' direction in S', it will also be observed moving only in the x direction in S. Ultimately, the user acknowledges a mix-up between the velocities and plans to seek further clarification in lecture.
Mangoes
Messages
92
Reaction score
1
I'm being asked to derive the velocity transformation between vy and vy' and my result isn't exactly matching my goal but I don't know what I'm doing wrong. It's an introductory modern physics course and we're covering special relativity.

Assume a reference frame S' moving in some constant velocity vx with respect to a stationary frame S. Since time isn't synchronized (dt ≠ dt') then the velocities vy and vy' aren't the same even though y and y' aren't being affected by length contraction (y = y'). The aforementioned statement isn't necessary for the following but I'm just wondering if the above is a correct statement.

Anyways, this is my logic:
Since y = y', dy = dy'. I want to know dy/dt'. From the chain rule:

\frac{dy}{dt'} = \frac{dy}{dt}\frac{dt}{dt'}

Letting λ = \frac{1}{(1 - (v/c)^2)^{1/2}}, the Lorrentz transformation for time is:

t' = λ(t - \frac{vx}{c^2})

Since there is no fundamental difference between two inertial reference frames, the inverse transformation must be of the same form:

t = λ(t' + \frac{vx'}{c^2})

In differential form,

dt = λ(dt' + \frac{vdx'}{c^2})

Now differentiating the above wrt t',

\frac{dt}{dt'} = λ(\frac{dt'}{dt'} + v\frac{dx'}{dt'}/c^2)

\frac{dt}{dt'} = λ(1 + vv_x'/c^2)

Going back to my original goal:

\frac{dy}{dt'} = \frac{dy}{dt}\frac{dt}{dt'} = v_y\frac{dt}{dt'}

\frac{dy}{dt'} = v_y(λ(1 + vv_x'/c^2))

...which is wrong. Where am I going wrong with this? Would appreciate some clarity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the object have a velocity component also in the x-direction in S? What is ##v_x'## if ##v_x = v##?
 
If I'm understanding correctly, yes, the object would have a velocity component in S. I just realized I should have been a little more clear in my first post.

The origin O' in S' is moving along with some velocity vx and an observer at rest in S' is observing an object P in S' to be moving in a direction parallel to the direction of S' with velocity u.

An observer in a stationary frame S would then see P's velocity to be given by the Lorrentz velocity transformation,

v_x' = \frac{v_x - u}{1 - \frac{uv_x}{c^2}}

The inverse transform for vx in terms of vx would be obtained by swapping primes and replacing u by -u.

The more I think about it, the more I get confused though. If P is moving only in the direction parallel to motion of S' and both observers in S and S' agree that y = y', I'm not seeing how it's possible for P to be observed to have a velocity perpendicular to vx in either frame S or S'. I think I'll just have to ask for clarification in lecture because I think I must have misheard or misunderstood something in the premise.

The result I'm being asked should be

v_y' = \frac{v_y(1 - (v/c)^2)^{1/2}}{1 - \frac{uv_x}{c^2}}
 
Last edited:
Mangoes said:
The origin O' in S' is moving along with some velocity vx and an observer at rest in S' is observing an object P in S' to be moving in a direction parallel to the direction of S' with velocity u.
I think you have those mixed up. The origin O' is seen to move with velocity u in frame S (parallel to the x axis). The object moves with velocity v'x in S' and velocity vx in S.

I'm not seeing how it's possible for P to be observed to have a velocity perpendicular to vx in either frame S or S'.
It's not. You're mixing yourself up. If P is moving only in the x' direction according to S', then it will be moving only in the x direction according to S.
 
Doc Al said:
I think you have those mixed up. The origin O' is seen to move with velocity u in frame S (parallel to the x axis). The object moves with velocity v'x in S' and velocity vx in S.

Yes, you're right. Thank you. I switched around vx and u.

Doc Al said:
It's not. You're mixing yourself up. If P is moving only in the x' direction according to S', then it will be moving only in the x direction according to S.

Yeah, I would think not. I'll just ask when I get the chance to clarify the premise. I must have misunderstood or misheard something.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top