Louisiana Schools Teaching Creationism Vs Evolution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the teaching of Creationism versus Evolution in Louisiana schools, particularly focusing on the implications of state funding for private schools and how educational standards are evaluated. Participants express concerns about the quality of education and the influence of religious beliefs on scientific teaching.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express outrage over the Louisiana education system allowing private schools to teach Creationism alongside Evolution, questioning the standards used to evaluate educational quality.
  • Others argue that education should be federally governed to ensure all children receive a consistent and quality education, free from religious influence.
  • There is a viewpoint that the teaching of Creationism undermines scientific understanding and misrepresents the nature of scientific theories, particularly regarding Evolution.
  • Some participants suggest that teaching Creationism as equivalent to science requires compromising the truth, raising concerns about the integrity of educational practices.
  • One participant emphasizes that teaching various creation stories should not be equated with teaching Creationism as a competing scientific theory, suggesting an agenda behind such teachings.
  • Several participants agree on the need for regulated education to prevent what they perceive as indoctrination or "brainwashing" of children.
  • There are personal reflections on the quality of education received by participants, contrasting it with the current situation in Louisiana.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express disagreement regarding the appropriateness of teaching Creationism in schools, with multiple competing views on the implications for educational standards and the role of religion in education. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the best approach to education in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific information about which schools are involved in teaching these theories and the absence of a clear framework for evaluating the curriculum in private institutions receiving state funding.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,205
Reaction score
7,687
Apparently a few schools in Louisiana, which are private but have state funding, are teaching Creationism vs Evolution as competing theories. http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/here-is-what-louisiana-schoolchildren-learn-about

The article has a link to another one that explains that the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education doesn't even look at what they teach to decide if they meet "standards", but only HOW they teach. http://www.theadvertiser.com/proart/20121119/news01/121119011/louisiana-may-skip-private-school-certification-rule-?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|&pagerestricted=1

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Under Louisiana's Constitution, any nonpublic school getting state money must be certified as providing a curriculum or specialized course of study at least equal to those required for similar public schools.
"We don't look at the quality of the curriculum," said James Garvey of Metairie, who co-chairs the board's School Innovation and Turnaround Committee.

"We don't look at what they teach," he said. "We look at the system. We look at policies and procedures, not what they teach. It's how they teach and not what they teach."

I didn't see a link to anything naming which particular schools, so if anyone sees one or knows how to find them, let me know.

This whole thing seems...abhorrent...

Edit: Mistyped Louisiana in the title. Any chance someone could change it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
"It's not what they teach". This is so wrong. SO WRONG.

Yes, Louisiana is probably the worst state for education in the entire US. That is a huge flaw in our system, allowing states to decide on education. Education should be Federally governed so that all children have the same chance at getting a normal education. Children shouldn't be deprived because they live in a backwards state.
 
Yes, but like practically everything, it's always Freedom vs Something else. Freedom for people to choose what their children are taught in this case I suppose. I disagree with the schools and the board, and I think it's wrong, not just because it's religious and in a school supported by the state, but also because it tries to support something as being science-like that isn't and knocks real knowledge down a notch due to complete misunderstanding of what a theory is and how much overwhelming evidence we have for evolution.
 
Drakkith said:
Yes, but like practically everything, it's always Freedom vs Something else. Freedom for people to choose what their children are taught in this case I suppose. I disagree with the schools and the board, and I think it's wrong, not just because it's religious and in a school supported by the state, but also because it tries to support something as being science-like that isn't and knocks real knowledge down a notch due to complete misunderstanding of what a theory is and how much overwhelming evidence we have for evolution.
I believe that education is one thing that should be regulated. All children should be given an equally good education, free of superstition and fear.

If parents want to brainwash their children, they can do it outside of school. I think that refusing to give your children a realistic education should be treated as child abuse.
 
Evo said:
I believe that education is one thing that should be regulated. All children should be given an equally good education, free of superstition and fear.

If parents want to brainwash their children, they can do it outside of school. I think that refusing to give your children a realistic education should be treated as child abuse.

Yep. Agreed.
 
And it's not just our own children. All the children that are taught in our state (Maine takes 1/2 of our property taxes for education) should be given a proper education. If their parents want to to deride this education as lies, they can do it on their own time.
 
I volunteer Turbo to move and become the new science teacher of a private school in Louisiana. Have fun in your new home turbo :)
 
This has nothing to do with teaching creationism vs evolution as competing theories. Teaching creationism would involve teaching various creation stories, such as Prometheus and his brother making humans out of clay. That's obviously not going to be taught as a competing theory. This is about teaching Christianity as the truth. And anyone who actually presents creationism (Christianity) vs evolution as competing theories is going to have an agenda.
 
Evo said:
"It's not what they teach". This is so wrong. SO WRONG.
Even if you accept that statement as right, teaching creationism as equivalent to science (regardless of whether or not creationism as true) requires a lot of compromises with the truth. How can that kind of an attitude in a teacher not be a part of 'how they teach'?
 
  • #10
leroyjenkens said:
This has nothing to do with teaching creationism vs evolution as competing theories. Teaching creationism would involve teaching various creation stories, such as Prometheus and his brother making humans out of clay. That's obviously not going to be taught as a competing theory. This is about teaching Christianity as the truth. And anyone who actually presents creationism (Christianity) vs evolution as competing theories is going to have an agenda.

Very well said!

I put my money on it being about money.
 
  • #11
Containment said:
I volunteer Turbo to move and become the new science teacher of a private school in Louisiana. Have fun in your new home turbo :)
No thanks. Been there and hated it. The deep south is not for me.
 
  • #12
All of this makes me feel so fortunate I received the education I did, where the emphasis was on learning. Period. Not abusing children to push an agenda, not to make governments look good, not to churn out "cogs" for industry. The nearest was when teachers would "push" their individual political outlook on a class, but we had teachers of all persuasions doing it so it was balanced, and anyway it was probably just done so we could learn the different viewpoints anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K