Lower energy level more stable why?

AI Thread Summary
Lower energy states of matter are generally more stable due to thermodynamic principles, but this stability also depends on entropy and temperature. At higher temperatures, higher energy states can become more stable, complicating the relationship between energy and stability. Kinetically stable states can exist even if they are thermodynamically unstable, meaning transformations may occur slowly and be unobservable. An example is the reaction between calcium oxide and carbon dioxide, where the product, calcium carbonate, is lower in energy at room temperature but can be reversed at high temperatures due to entropy considerations. Understanding these concepts, including Gibbs free energy, is essential for deeper studies in chemistry and physics.
Vivek des
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am a high school student.. I have come across so many times that lower energy state of matter is more stable than higher energy states .. I can't understand why. Someone help me out.. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not that simple. The thermodynamic stability of a state of matter, relative to some other state, depends not only on the difference in "energy" between the states, but also on the difference in the entropy of the states. The relative importance of these considerations depends on temperature. In higher temperature the higher energy state can be more stable.

Also, even a thermodynamically unstable state can be kinetically stable, which means that the transformation to other states is so slow that it can't be observed.
 
hilbert2 said:
It's not that simple. The thermodynamic stability of a state of matter, relative to some other state, depends not only on the difference in "energy" between the states, but also on the difference in the entropy of the states. The relative importance of these considerations depends on temperature. In higher temperature the higher energy state can be more stable.

Also, even a thermodynamically unstable state can be kinetically stable, which means that the transformation to other states is so slow that it can't be observed.

I do have some idea on thermodynamics can u explain further?
 
For example, at room temperature calcium oxide and carbon dioxide react to form calcium carbonate: ##CaO + CO_{2}\longrightarrow CaCO_{3}##. The product is lower in energy than the reactants, and therefore energy is released to the surroundings in the reaction. However, at a high temperature the combination of ##CaO## and ##CO_ {2}## is more stable than ##CaCO_{3}##. Therefore, when calcium carbonate is heated strongly, the opposite reaction happens: ##CaCO_{3}\longrightarrow CaO + CO_{2}##. This happens because the ##CaO## and ##CO_ {2}## are higher in entropy than ##CaCO_{3}##.

Investigating the stability of states of matter, using concepts like Gibbs free energy, is not high school level material, but you will encounter it if you go on to study chemistry and physics in university.
 
"Force" is the negative of the gradient of the potential energy function. That is, the gradient points in the direction of increasing energy so the force vector point in the direction of decreasing energy. If we move away from a position of lowest energy, the resultant force pushes us back.
 
It's very simple. A state can spontaneously shed excess energy and convert to a lower energy state. The reverse cannot be done spontaneously because it requires an external source of energy to supply the needed energy excess.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top