Lowest Ionization Potential: Atom e (55 133 Cs)

AI Thread Summary
The atom with the lowest ionization potential is 55 133 Cs (cesium), primarily due to its large atomic radius, which places its outermost electron farther from the nucleus. This distance reduces the energy required to remove the electron, resulting in a low ionization potential of 3.9 eV. In contrast, atoms like helium, nitrogen, oxygen, and argon have smaller atomic radii, making their outer electrons more tightly bound and requiring more energy to remove them. The ionization potential is influenced by the electron configuration and the filling of electron shells, with cesium's lone outer electron in the sixth shell being particularly easy to remove. Overall, cesium's unique properties make it the element with the lowest ionization potential among the options provided.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Which of the following atoms has the lowest ionization potential?
a. 2 4 He
b. 7 14 N
c. 8 16 O
d. 18 40 Ar
e. 55 133 Cs

The answer is e. Can someone explain the general concepts and reasoning behind this? Thanks,
--YG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my humble opinion this is dirty chemistry... The theory behind this goes back to electron shells in elementary chemistry for example the s1, s2, p1, s3, p2, d1 and so on. It is a matter of knowing which shells fill how man 'slots' there are in each level and intuiting the qualitative ionization potential. The s shells have 2 slots, the p shells have 6, the d shells have 10,and the f shells have 14... You can figure out where the electrons are with simple subtraction knowing the patterns of filling. Remember that the s orbitals of the n+1 level typically fill before the d orbitals of level n. It's easy to note the pattern of Ionization potential when shown a chart of them, check one out it'll be a tremendous help.

A) He; Helium is going to have a relatively high ionization potential because it has only two electrons which completely fill the lowest (and closest to positive nucleus) energy shell. {2 electrons in S1} 24.5 eV

B) N; Nitrogen fills up the lowest energy shell the s2 orbital and half of the p1 orbital (half an orbital is stabilier than half +1 of an orbital in the lower atomic numbers).{2 in S1, 2 in S2, and 3 in p1} 14.5eV

C) O; Oxygen is Nitrogen plus one and as mentioned above half a full orbital is stabiler than half plus one at this atomic level.{2 in S1, 2 in S2, 4 in p1} 13.6eV

D) Ar; Argon has filled S1, S2, P1, S3, and P1. Since it has filled them it has a high ionization potential of 15.8 eV.

E) Cs; Cesium is by far the best choice of these elements for the lowest ionization energy. It has S1->5 filled, p1->3 filled, and d1 and 2 filled. There is a lonesome electron in the 6th S orbital that is far out from the nucleus which is very easily removed due to it's distance and the fact that it is alone in an orbital. {2 in S1->5, 6 in p1->3, 10 in d1,2 and only 1 in S6.} IP of 3.9eV

I hope this helped, I'm not the best at exlpaining stupid chemistry!

Bored CSMPhysicist
 


The ionization potential of an atom refers to the amount of energy required to remove an electron from the atom. The lower the ionization potential, the easier it is to remove an electron from the atom. In this case, the atom with the lowest ionization potential is 55 133 Cs, also known as cesium.

Cesium has the lowest ionization potential because it has the largest atomic radius among these atoms. This means that the outermost electron in cesium is farther away from the nucleus compared to the other atoms. As a result, it requires less energy to remove the outermost electron in cesium, making it the atom with the lowest ionization potential.

On the other hand, atoms such as helium, nitrogen, oxygen, and argon have smaller atomic radii, meaning their outermost electrons are closer to the nucleus. This makes it harder to remove an electron from these atoms, resulting in higher ionization potentials.

In summary, the atom with the lowest ionization potential is 55 133 Cs because it has the largest atomic radius, making it easier to remove an electron from the atom.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top