Luminous intensity in different directions

AI Thread Summary
The intensity of direct sunlight on a surface normal to the rays is defined as Io. When the surface normal makes an angle of 60 degrees with the rays, the intensity does not remain Io; it must decrease due to the angle. The discussion highlights that luminous intensity is constant in a particular direction but varies with the angle of incidence, which affects the power received per unit area. The relationship between luminous intensity and angle is clarified, emphasizing that intensity must change with angle, contrary to some initial assumptions. Overall, the intensity on an angled surface is influenced by the cosine of the angle, leading to a decrease from the maximum intensity Io.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# The intensity of direct sunlight on a surface normal to the rays is Io. What is the intensity of direct sunlight on a surface whose normal makes an angle of 60 degrees with the rays of the sun?
I think the answer is Io itself because for an isotropic point source of light the luminous intensity is the same in all directions. Is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I may be barking up the wrong tree, so correct me someone if I'm wrong but...

By your reasoning, if the angle of normal to the surface tended towards zero, then if the intensity at all points were Io then the total energy across the surface would tend to infinity (for an infinite surface).

The intensity must decrease with distance.

EaGG
 
Why wouldn't it be cos(60)?
 
I think lamberts inverse square law is true only for illuminance and not for luminous intensity.
Illuminance = [(luminous intensity) x (cos(theta))]/R^2
Luminous intensity = (Luminous flux)/(Solid angle)
Luminous intensity is equal to the Luminous flux for unit solid angle. By definition of Luminous Flux, it is the energy of the visible part of the radiation emitted,transmitted or received per second. As the solid angle is increased, the total flux goes on increasing and reaches a maximum value at 4(pi) steradians. So I think in a particular direction the luminous intensity is constant irrespective of the distance. I may be wrong.
 
hmmmm...

The question as you typed it asks for the intensity falling on a surface rather than for a given solid angle. The intensity - a measure of the power received per unit area must change with angle.

EaGG
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top