Why does the product of the gradients of perpendicular lines equal -1 in 3D?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yh Hoo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The product of the gradients of two perpendicular lines in 3D is always -1 because their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. When one line has a gradient m, the perpendicular line has a gradient of -1/m. This relationship can be demonstrated through geometric proofs involving similar triangles, where the angles and corresponding sides maintain proportionality. Additionally, trigonometric principles and vector analysis in 3D reinforce this concept, confirming that the slopes of perpendicular lines will always multiply to -1. Understanding this relationship is essential for grasping the geometric properties of lines in various dimensions.
Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
M1.m2 = -1 ??

Why is the product of the gradients of 2 straight line perpendicular to each other is always equal to -1 ?? Is there any theory to explain this ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


The slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other. So if y_{1} and y_{2} are perpendicular lines (in standard form) then \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{1}}{\mathrm{d} x} = m and \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{2}}{\mathrm{d} x} = -m^{-1} so their products will simply be -1.
 


I think the easiest proof is a geometric one using similar triangles.

- The attachment shows a line, gradient m1, and a perpendicular.

- The two angles marked with dots are equal. (Complementary to common angle).

- By similar triangles d/1 = 1/m1

- By definition (rise/run) the gradient of the perpendicular = -d/1 = -1/m1
 

Attachments

  • perpline.jpg
    perpline.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 3,811
Last edited:


Yh Hoo said:
Why is the product of the gradients of 2 straight line perpendicular to each other is always equal to -1 ?? Is there any theory to explain this ??

There are many ways to prove this. One and the simpler way is illustrated to you by WannaBeNewton in above post .

Other ways are by trigonometry , use of trigonometrical coordinates , Use of other theorems etc.

I am showing you another simpler way by similarity of triangles ( I hope you know it.)

Let one line with side of course x1-x and y1-y be intersected by other line with side of course x3-x2 and y3-y2 be intersected at angle 90o

Now you complete their intersection by joining their ends with dotted lines (note one end will be common ie intersection point). You'll notice it will form two right angled triangles .
Now you prove those two triangles similar by their same shape .

By this ,
All corresponding sides of 2 triangles will be proportional , ie
y1-y/x1-x = x3-x2/y3-y2

or1

m1=-1/m2
(Realize one line inclination is > 90 degree hence slope is negative.)

m1 x m2 = -1

QED .
 


WannabeNewton said:
The slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other. So if y_{1} and y_{2} are perpendicular lines (in standard form) then \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{1}}{\mathrm{d} x} = m and \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{2}}{\mathrm{d} x} = -m^{-1} so their products will simply be -1.

I think he meant: explain the cause of the result

attachment.php?attachmentid=38422&stc=1&d=1314772955.png


we have 2 perpendicular lines l and l1. the slope of l = -y/x and the slope of l1 = y1/x1

triangle (O,x1,y1) is similar to triangle (M,x1,x) (two angles are the same)
This triangle is also similar to triangle (O, y, x)

therefore y/x = x1/y1 and if you substitute that in the slope of l1, you'll see it's equal to x/y, so the product of the two slopes = -1
 

Attachments

  • perp.png
    perp.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 4,023


Think in 3D.

Put differently;<m,1> vector is forming 90 degrees with <n,1> vector 2D gradients since original graphs retain perpendicularity.

thus m*n+1=0*sqrt(n**2+1)sqrt(m**2+1)

You can further solve to find
m*n = -1

m=-1/n
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top