Maclaurin Series used to find associated radius of convergence Q

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Maclaurin series for cos(x) and the associated radius of convergence. Participants are exploring methods to determine the radius of convergence and discussing the representation of the series in sigma notation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the ratio test to find the radius of convergence and question the implications of obtaining an infinite radius. There is also a focus on expressing the series in sigma notation and identifying patterns in coefficients.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the results of the ratio test and the meaning of an infinite radius of convergence. Some participants are seeking to understand the terminology and concepts being used, while others provide insights into the nature of convergence for the series.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the interpretation of results from the ratio test and the terminology used to describe the radius of convergence. Participants are navigating through these concepts without reaching a consensus on the definitions and implications.

badtwistoffate
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I have the Maclaurin series for cos (x), is their a way to find its radius of convergence from that?

ALSO
Is there a trick to find the shorter version of the power series for the Maclaurin series, I can never seem to find it so instead of the long series with each term but like E summation (the series)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
badtwistoffate said:
I have the Maclaurin series for cos (x), is their a way to find its radius of convergence from that?

you can try the ratio test.

badtwistoffate said:
ALSO
Is there a trick to find the shorter version of the power series for the Maclaurin series, I can never seem to find it so instead of the long series with each term but like E summation (the series)

Err, do you mean writing the series using the sigma notation instead of the first few terms followed by some ...? You want to look for patterns in the coefficients. No real trick, practice will help though.
 
shmoe said:
you can try the ratio test.
Err, do you mean writing the series using the sigma notation instead of the first few terms followed by some ...? You want to look for patterns in the coefficients. No real trick, practice will help though.

Yeah i tried the ratio test, but the radius of convergence it sayed in the big is infinity, how is that possible as it has to be n < 1?
 
badtwistoffate said:
Yeah i tried the ratio test, but the radius of convergence it sayed in the big is infinity, how is that possible as it has to be n < 1?

I don't understand what you're saying, what's "in the big" mean? What are you calling n that it has to be less than 1?
 
shmoe said:
I don't understand what you're saying, what's "in the big" mean? What are you calling n that it has to be less than 1?

Sorry I ment to say in the book the radius of convergence is infinity, how is that possible seeing the result of the ratio test gives you L and it has to be less then 1? how to you get that radius of infinity?
 
You should have found that for *any* value of x, the limit the ratio test gives is always less than 1, hence the series converges for all values of x and we say the radius of convergence is infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K