Macroscopic Absorption Cross-Section

Naimbora
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The compositions of nuclear reactors are often stated in volume fractions. i.e the fractions of the volume of some region that are composed of particular materials. Show that the macroscopic cross section for the equivalent homogeneous mixture of materials is given by

∑a = f1 ∑a1 + f2∑a2 + …..

where fi and ∑ai are respectively the volume fraction and macroscopic absorption cross section of the ith constituent at its normal density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I took a look at John Lamarsh's book; Int. to Nuclear Engineering but there is not a exact clue to solve tihs problem.. Also i could got nothing on the net. Its very simple to make a prediction about this but what is the exact proof behind this situation..
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top