Magic Numbers in the Nucleus: Fact vs. Fiction

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
I am really not sure and do not understand how you find out what are the magic numbers in case of nucleus. Here in leson

lecturer said that magic number is ##114##, and in other resourses I find number ##126##? Do we have any real confirmation of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Magic?
 
Magic numbers get more messy with increasing number of protons or neutrons. It is possible that both are "a bit" magic, or that one model is not very accurate.
126 seems to be well-established (for neutrons only of course), large deformed nuclei might have other magic numbers.

@rootone: Magic numbers
 
Thanks mfb.
Still 42 could be the ultimate answer to life, the universe, and everything.
'Deep thought' announced that the ultimate answer was indeed 42, but the audience would not like that.
Because they had not provided it with the ultimate question.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top