Magnetic attraction between infinite current sheets

AI Thread Summary
Infinite current sheets generate uniform magnetic fields on either side, which cancel between identical sheets with currents flowing in the same direction, leading to attraction due to the interaction of current lines. In contrast, two infinite sheets with opposite electric charges result in cancellation of electric field lines except between the sheets, demonstrating a different behavior from magnetic fields. The potential energy stored in the magnetic field can be released as kinetic energy aligned with the current flow, while the energy associated with electric fields behaves oppositely. The discussion highlights the complexities of electromagnetic interactions and the role of potential energy in these systems. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the dynamics of current and charge interactions in physics.
particlezoo
Messages
111
Reaction score
4
It is my understanding that fields store potential energy. That applies to both magnetic as well as electric fields. I know that the energy density also increases with the square of the norm of their vector value (at each coordinate).

When I have an infinite current sheet, the math says[1] that it will generate magnetic fields that are uniform on each side the sheet. So if I have two such sheets, with identical currents pointing the same way, the magnet fields should cancel between the sheets, and they should add elsewhere.

My understanding is that these sheets should attract because they are composed of numerous lines of current, and these should attract each other. This remains the case even for an arbitrary charge/mass ratio, such that induction effects may be ignored.

Yet, if we replace the two infinite current sheets with two infinite sheets with opposite electric charge, the same attraction will result in cancellation of electric field lines, except between the sheets. This is the exact opposite of the case for magnetic field of two infinite current sheets.

It would seem that (1/2)B^2/mu_0 in the ordinary vacuum of space represents potential energy stored in the magnetic field that can be released as kinetic energy in the same direction as the charge carrier flow, while the same represents the negative value of the potential energy (i.e. a binding energy) that can be released as kinetic energy at right angles to the current density.

Is this a surprise to any of you? If not, how were you taught to think of this?

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_sheet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential energy usually refers to a potential, so it does not apply to the energy density of electromagnetic fields.
Two current sheets that approach each other would see some induced resistance, slowing current flow. You increase the volume with field, but you reduce the current and therefore the field strength, that's where the energy comes from.
That does not happen with the charged plates.
 
mfb said:
Potential energy usually refers to a potential, so it does not apply to the energy density of electromagnetic fields.
Two current sheets that approach each other would see some induced resistance, slowing current flow. You increase the volume with field, but you reduce the current and therefore the field strength, that's where the energy comes from.
That does not happen with the charged plates.

Ok.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top