Magnetic Attraction: The North Pole & Earth's Geographic North

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the north pole of a magnet and Earth's geographic north pole, exploring concepts of magnetic attraction, naming conventions, and historical context. Participants engage in clarifying terminology and the implications of magnetic versus geographic poles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the north pole of a magnet does not attract to the geographic north pole of the Earth, but rather to the north magnetic pole, which is distinct and moves over time.
  • Others argue that the naming convention of the magnetic poles is based on their orientation towards the geographic poles, leading to confusion about which pole is which.
  • A participant mentions that the magnetic north pole is actually a magnetic south pole in terms of its attraction to the north pole of a magnet.
  • There is a historical perspective shared about how the terms 'north' and 'south' were established based on early observations of lodestones and compasses.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the conventions used in teaching regarding magnetic and geographic poles, suggesting that there may be multiple conventions in use.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between magnetic and geographic poles and the implications of their naming conventions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions of magnetic and geographic poles, as well as the historical context of how these terms were established. Participants express varying levels of understanding and familiarity with the topic.

Zinc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why does the north pole of a magnet attract to the north geographic pole of the Earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two things about that...
#1) it doesn't
#2) it doesn't

There might be a third one that I'm missing, but that about covers it.

To start with, it is not the geographic north pole that it points to; it's the north magnetic pole, which actually moves around. An air traffic controller, for instance, might instruct a pilot to "steer one four seven magnetic" to make sure that the direction isn't taken to mean "one four seven true". The latitude determines how much difference there is between the two poles.
Secondly, the pole of the magnet is called 'north' because that's the magnetic pole that it points to. It's actually a 'south' pole in reference to the planet.
Welcome to PF, by the way.
 
Last edited:
Two things about that...
#1) it doesn't
#2) it doesn't
it does
it does

To start with, it is not the geographic north pole that it points to; it's the north magnetic pole, which actually moves around.

it does attract to the magnetic SOUTH pole which is about at the noth geographic pole
 
Let's not get into semantics here. Before anyone knew anything about geology or planetology or anything else, people noticed that a lodestone would tend to orient itself toward the 'top' and 'bottom' of the planet. The direction 'north' was already established, so they called the pole of the magnet 'north' since it pointed that way. The planet has more right to the name 'north' than does any magnet.
 
the magnetic poles were decieded what is north and south according to where it was pointing on the planet, not the other way around
 
:confused:
 
Danger, I was taught that the NP of a magnet points to the Magnetic South Pole, which is very close to the Geographic North Pole. I believe that's how the naming convention works...but it's possible there's more than one convention in use.

Irrespective of the semantics, reason for this is in the equation for the torque acting on a magnetic moment in an external magnetic field (or, alternatively, in the energy equation).
 
Last edited:
thats how it was decieded, the point that points to the north is the northpole of the magnet, and the otehr southpole. and as science figured out north attract to south tehrefor magnetic south have to be at geographic north
 
Gokul43201 said:
Danger, I was taught that the NP of a magnet points to the Magnetic South Pole, which is very close to the Geographic North Pole
Gokul, I don't have a clue of who you are other than the fact that I have immense respect and appreciation for your inputs to PF. I've learned a lot from you, and am apparently still doing so in this thread. Because of your expertise and mature approach to everything, I had assumed that you were somewhere in my age range. This is apparently wrong. When I was in school a couple of years ago :rolleyes: , we were taught it as I posted. It would seem that the convention has changed, so I apologize for the bad posts. And thank you for translating, because I was honestly having some trouble following part of the thread.
 
  • #10
It's now a moot point, but I just remembered something about the way we were taught it. It was based upon the fact that with original lodestone, and the compasses manufactured thereof, the end of the needle was not called the 'north pole'; it was called the 'north-seeking pole'. By that convention, the planetary pole was already defined as 'north'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K