Magnetic dipole at the centre of a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field inside a sphere with a point magnetic dipole at its center. The original poster attempts to use an analogy between electric and magnetic dipoles but finds discrepancies in their results. Key questions arise regarding the assumptions made about the dipole's dimensions and the relevance of the sphere in the calculations. It is emphasized that the magnetization of the sphere must be considered, as it contributes to the net magnetic field. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately relating magnetic fields B and H to their electric counterparts D and E.
shubham agn
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The problem is as follows: There is a point magnetic dipole embedded at the center of a sphere (radius R) of linear magnetic material of permeability μ. What is the magnetic field inside the sphere?
I know that this problem has been solved in many books.But I am trying a different method. Since the magnetic field of a magnetic dipole takes the same form as electric field of an electric dipole, I calculated the electric field inside a sphere (of linear dielectric material of permittivity ε) having a point electric dipole embedded at the center.
And then just replaced ε by 1/μ and the electric dipole moment 'p' by the magnetic dipole moment 'm' and of course epsilon naught by one over mu naught. But the answer does not match the correct answer.
Is this method of mine wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) Do you mean the field at a distance R from the centre of the dipole?
(2) Are you assuming (as usual) that the linear dimensions of the dipole are much less than R?
(3) It would probably help if you posted your own result.
 
Philip Wood said:
(1) Do you mean the field at a distance R from the centre of the dipole?
(2) Are you assuming (as usual) that the linear dimensions of the dipole are much less than R?
(3) It would probably help if you posted your own result.
First, thanks for your reply!
The question is to find the field at a distance r <R from the dipole. And yes the dipole is assumed to be a point dipole so its linear dimensions are small compared to R.
 
Still can't see the relevance of the sphere. Why not just find the field strength at distance r from (the centre of) the dipole?
shubham agn said:
But the answer does not match the correct answer.
And what was your answer?
 
Philip Wood said:
Still can't see the relevance of the sphere. Why not just find the field strength at distance r from (the centre of) the dipole?

And what was your answer?
The magnetic dipole will magnetize the sphere. This magnetization will create a field of its own. We need to find the net field, that is the resultant field due the dipole and the magnetization of the sphere. My answer is almost the same as that given in Griffiths text except that in the denominator of the second term mu naught and μ are interchanged in my answer.
 
You have to be more careful in relating B and H to D and E. Is your "magnetic field" B or H?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top