Magnetic Dipole: Discovering μ and Its Origin

AI Thread Summary
The formula μ = ½B(R^3) represents the magnetic moment, μ, derived from the magnetic field, B, of a sphere with radius R. Dimensional analysis confirms that μ has the same dimensions as the magnetic moment, which is expressed in weber⋅meter. The discussion highlights the need for context to fully understand the origin of this equation, particularly in relation to induced dipole moments in paramagnetic or diamagnetic materials. References to classical definitions and specific literature, such as Jackson's work, are suggested for deeper insights. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of context in deriving and applying the magnetic moment formula.
enerieire
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
does anyone knows where this formula comes from?

μ=½B(R^3)

I am considering a sphere of radius R, with B its magnetic field. Who is μ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Starting with; μ = ½ B r3, we can apply dimensional analysis to the problem.
B is measured in tesla = N⋅m−1⋅A−1
Multiply B by m3 to get; μ = N⋅m2⋅A−1
We know force; N = kg⋅m⋅s−2
So; μ = (kg⋅m⋅s−2)⋅(m2⋅A−1)
μ = m3⋅kg⋅s−2⋅A−1
Which has exactly the same dimensions as;
See tables; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_derived_unit
magnetic moment = weber⋅meter = m3⋅kg⋅s−2⋅A−1
So μ is the magnetic moment.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
Ok, that's right. But where does it comes from?

Starting from the classical definition for the magnetic moment for a charge distribution

μ=∑qr

I don't find an answer

Thanks
 
enerieire said:
Starting from the classical definition for the magnetic moment for a charge distribution

μ=∑qr

Are you sure that is the definition of magnetic moment?
 
We need the precise context of which problem you want to solve to help you. If you mean the induced dipole moment of a paramagnetic or diamagnetic medium by applying an external magnetic field, see Jackson, 3rd edition, Sect. 5.11.
 
There are many well trodden paths through this field. But the OP equation seems to be one or two steps off the path.
I agree we need more context to find the path again.
Maybe page 2 of this article will help; http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/RoR_WWW/presentations/Dipole.pdf
I quote:
The first equation of the dipole field in spherical polar coordinates (r,θ,φ)
is; B = 2 M cos θ / r3
where M is the dipole moment, which can be positive or negative.

From eqn (1) we get; M = ½ B r3 / cos θ
But on the dipole axis θ = 0, so; Cos θ = 1.
So; M = ½ B r3

The text box in the bottom corner gives the explanation and;
μ = 4π M / μo = M x 107.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top