Magnetic distortion of spacetime

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010614/010614-6.html

Einstein's theory of relativity tells us that gravity bends space. Now a physicist at the University of Portsmouth, UK, has worked out that magnetic fields may smooth bent space, casting doubt on the growth spurt that is proposed to have built the early Universe.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
im not sure if this is old news, however it is an interesting
article, if this is correct then "spacetime" becomes an even
more perplexing ,"medium".
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by wolram
however it is an interesting
article, if this is correct then "spacetime" becomes an even
more perplexing ,"medium". [/B]

Thanks for bringing it up wolram.
I would like to hear more of the issue of magnetic field - gravity interaction.

My first thoughts tend to indicate the opposite conclusion: It seems to me strong static magnetic fields increase the energy density of the vacuum, and thus ADD to the mass-energy content, thus, if anything, increases the curvature rather than 'straightening' it out.

My first impression though is that this author based his deductions on some assumptions: He said:

"Likewise, if space is distorted by gravity, magnetic field lines try to straighten it out again."

I believe this has never been shown to be true...if someone can show otherwise, that this is based on some sort of evidence, please present the info. I have a hard time accepting this assumption.
I seem to remember seeing evidence from quantum field theory that a static magnetic field is not a affected by gravity field. I'd like to hear other's opinions in that regard.

Creator :smile:
 
Last edited:


Originally posted by Creator


My first impression though is that this author based his deductions on some assumptions: He said:

"Likewise, if space is distorted by gravity, magnetic field lines try to straighten it out again."


If I'm reading the artical correctly, this is not one of Tsgas' assumptions. Rather, it seems to be his conclusion. How he reached this conclusion is not shown, I too would like to dig a little and see if I can find some of his research and what evidence he sites.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top