Magnetic field at the center of a solenoid?

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a magnetic field of 1.09 T at the center of a solenoid wrapped around a solid iron cylinder with a relative permeability of 1400, the number of wire turns must be calculated based on the current, length, radius, and permeability. While Ampere's law simplifies calculations, it may not be suitable due to the solenoid's finite length of 13.3 cm, leading to potential inaccuracies. Biot-Savart's law offers a more precise calculation for the magnetic field but may yield similar results when rounded to whole turns. The discussion emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate law for accurate magnetic field calculations. Ultimately, the number of turns needed can be determined by substituting the given values into the derived expression for the magnetic field.
tabitha2232
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A studetn needs to make a solenoid that produses 1.09 T at its center. a wire will be wrapped around a solid cylinder of iron with a relative permeability Km of 1400, a length of 13.3 cm and a radius of 1.92 cm. if the wire can carry a max current of 1.15 A how many turns of wire are neede to produce the desired B field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you try to find an expression for the magnetic field at the center of a solenoid?
(I think you cannot use Ampere's law here (since the length is only 13.3cm, if you use Ampere's law you assume the length is nearly infinite).)

The expression for B will be in terms of the current, the length, the radius, the permeability and the number of turns. Solve for the number of turns, and you can plug in your values.
 
(I can't edit my post anymore..?)

Do you know Ampere's law?
Do you know Biot-Savart's law?
Do you know which one you must use here?

You could use Ampere's law, which makes the calculation lots easier, but it will also be much more of an approximation.
If you use Biot-Savart's law the magnetic field is more exact. I don't know how much the answer will vary depending on which method you use, it could well be that it is the same (since you will also have to round it to an integer, having 31.53 coils for example doesn't make sense..)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top