What Determines the Value of km in Magnetic Field Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The value of km in magnetic field calculations can be either μ0/2π or μ0/4π, depending on the context and the length of the wire involved. For long straight wires (greater than 10 meters), the formula B = (μ0 I)/(2π r) is used, while the Biot-Savart law applies μ0/4π for shorter lengths. The difference arises from the approximation used for infinite versus finite wire lengths, where the latter requires more precise calculations. Km is a constant that helps relate magnetic forces to current, similar to Coulomb's Law in electrostatics. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate magnetic field calculations.
origamipro
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
For a moving charge is km = μ0/2pi or is km = μ0/4pi?

examples:
Biot-Savart (magnetic field dB at a point P due to a length element ds that carrues a steady current I is:
dB = (μ0/4pi) (I ds x r) / r^2

While for an long straight wire, (≥10m?)
B = (μ0 I)/(2pi r)

What is the different use 4pi when length is less than 10meters?

wikipedia says that km is
"In another system, the "rationalized-metre-kilogram-second (rmks) system" (or alternatively the "metre-kilogram-second-ampere (mksa) system"), km is written as μ0/2π, where μ0 is a measurement-system constant called the "magnetic constant".[12] The value of μ0 was chosen such that the rmks unit of current is equal in size to the ampere in the emu system: μ0 is defined to be 4π × 10−7 N A−2.[5]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_constant

However in my notes from class I have Km = 1E-7 as well as Km = 2E-7.

Which do i use for a charge particle. And why the difference in the stated formulas? is it the distance?

Km is suppose to be a constant not a variable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Biot-Savart is telling you the relationship you need.

It is the contribution to the magnetic field from an infinitesimal length of wire.
The other one (>10m you say) is actualy the result of doing the calculation for an infinite length of wire.
It is a good approximation where the distance from the wire is very small compared with the length of the wire.

The ##\mu_0## I know is usually referred to as "the permiability of free space".
Looking up "magnetic constant" and everyone says this is ##\mu_0## - including your reference.

The ##k_m## is an attempt to make magnetic relations look like Coulombs Law.
Like the wiki article says, there were many definitions, which basically sets the units for current, and the SI system settled on one. If $$F=k_m\frac{I^2}{r}$$ then $$k_m = \frac{\mu_0}{2\pi}$$ in SI units.

This will be consistent with the Biot Savart Law - once you've done the calculus.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top