What is the contribution of magnetic fields from individual loops in a solenoid?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the application of Ampere's Law in the context of a long solenoid. The equation B=μNI/L is derived considering a single wire carrying current, where N represents the number of turns over the length L. The confusion arises from the misconception of summing magnetic fields from individual loops, which is incorrect as they contribute to the same magnetic field rather than adding to it. The resolution emphasizes that only distinct currents in separate wires should have their magnetic fields summed, not those in the same wire.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ampere's Law
  • Magnetic fields in solenoids
  • Understanding of Gaussian surfaces
  • Basic electromagnetism concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Ampere's Law in detail
  • Explore the concept of magnetic fields in solenoids further
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the differences between magnetic fields from separate wires versus the same wire
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electromagnetism and the behavior of magnetic fields in solenoids.

OperationalAmp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused with the equation for a long solenoid. The usual derivation has us consider a rectangular loop enclosing N number of currents over the length L through it. So by Ampere's law one gets B=μNI/L.

The currents and the loop look like this right?
---------
| . . . . |
---------
x x x x

However, why doesn't one also consider the magnetic field contribution from the x's also? So that the sum will be B=2μNI/L? In fact one can find an infinite number of these loops each giving B and the magnetic field will sum to infinity. Which clearly is nonsense.

It's like Gauss's Law for charges, I have +q and -q separated symmetrically. I ask what's the magnitude of the electric field at a distance r from both charges. I enclose each with a Gaussian surface and I find the field from each of them +q/r² and -(-q/r²); the double negatives to take direction into consideration. Later I also have to add the fields together to get 2q/r², and not say q/r² is what's actually there just from taking one Gaussian surface.

I hope someone can enlighten me. Thank you! :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have realized what was my problem. I simply misunderstood Ampere's law. You see Ampere's law is going to give a magnetic field associated to a current flowing in one wire. And in the solenoid, it is one wire! So it is nonsense to sum the same magnetic field many times over. Only when there are two currents in separate wire do we add their magnetic fields. In the case of the solenoid, the approximation was that each wire winding are not connected to one another, thus explaining the factor N. So at the end of the day, one do not add magnetic fields arising from the current in the same wire.

Problem solved!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K