Magnetic field measurement with high accuracy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the suitability of using Hall Sensors, specifically the AD22151, for measuring magnetic fields in the range of 0 to 50 mT with a resolution of 25 µT. The user expresses concerns about the sensor's specifications, particularly the gain and offset errors, which are ±1% and ±60 mT, respectively, questioning their adequacy for high-accuracy measurements. Temperature fluctuations of up to 1°C are noted, which could impact the sensor's performance. The user seeks clarification on whether the AD22151 can meet their accuracy requirements given these parameters. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for precise sensor specifications in magnetic field measurement applications.
Zollie
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to use a Hall Sensor (e.g. http://fwbell.com/Category/2.aspx) or a Hall Element IC, like the AD22151 device for magnetic field measurement with a range from 0 to ca. 0,5 mT with a resolution of 250 nT. (500 ppm) The temperature fluctuations are max 1 C.
Do you think I can use one these sensors for my work?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I realized I made a mistake and the field range is 0- 50 mT and the resolution is 25 uT (=500ppm). Do you think the AD22151 can do this for me? There are some specifications that I don't understand, like the gain and offset errors over temperature range. They are ±1% and ±60 mT, which seems to high for me...
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top