Magnetic field of a rectangular coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for the magnetic field of a square coil, B = m0*2*sqrt(2)*I*N/(a*pi), where m0 represents permeability and a is the side length. The user struggles to understand the derivation, particularly the factor of 2, and notes that the formula is intended for the center of the square coil. They explore the relationship between the square coil and the magnetic field of a single wire segment, but find that their attempts lead to confusion regarding the integration process required for accurate calculations. Ultimately, it is suggested that a solid understanding of integrals is necessary before tackling the complexities of square loops. Understanding the derivation and integration methods is crucial for mastering this topic.
magnetized
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I got this formula for the magnetic field of a square-shaped coil: B = m0*2*sqrt(2)*I*N/(a*pi), where m0 is the permeability, and a is the side of the square... I can't really get why it is so, and my best tries resulted in approximation of the 'diameter' of the coil, for example by taking the diagonal of the square... thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That formula is for the field at the center of the square, although I don't get the factor of 2. It is derived by using the Biot-Savart law for a wire segment of length a four times.
The field of a wire segment of length a is found by integrating from -a/2 to +a/2, instead of infinity in the usual derivation for an infinite wire.
 
hm, is there a way to avoid integrals? i found some similarities with the formula for a single wire segment, B = m0*I/(2*r*pi), as a single loop is just 4 of these put in shape of a square, and the orientation of the vector for every segment is the same if we look at the magnetic field in the center, but this turns out to be just four times the formula given above, and r = a/2, so i get B = 4*m0*I/(r*pi)

//edit
ok, i read the 'instead of infinity' now... i guess no hope for getting it right, i guess, as we haven't done integrals yet in school
 
Last edited:
You'd better hold off on square loops until integration.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top