Magnetic field strength and distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between magnetic field strength and distance, specifically for a bar magnet, which behaves like a magnetic dipole. It is established that the magnetic field strength decreases with the cube of the distance, following the formula 1/r^3. Participants seek clarification and proof of this relationship, referencing examples such as the field along the axis of a circular current loop. The concept of modeling a bar magnet as two opposite magnetic monopoles is also discussed to illustrate the field's behavior. Overall, the consensus confirms that the divisor for magnetic field strength is indeed distance cubed.
julianbury
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Gravitational force is divided by distance squared.

What is the equivalent divisor for a fixed bar magnet?

Thank you for your kind attention :-)

(-_-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A bar magnet is approximately a magnetic dipole. Far from a dipole, the field goes like 1/r^3.
 
Hello jtbell :-)

Math is not my forte so please allow to confirm:

the divisor for magnetic field strength is distance cubed?

Or have I misunderstood?

(-_-)
 
Why the magnetic field is propotional to 1/r^3 .
Can you prove it?
 
julianbury said:
the divisor for magnetic field strength is distance cubed?

Yes.

IPhO' 2008 said:
Why the magnetic field is propotional to 1/r^3 .
Can you prove it?

See for example the field along the axis of a circular current loop, another example of a magnetic dipole:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/%E2%80%8Chbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c3

and take the limit as z >> R.

Or you can pretend that the magnet consists of two opposite polarity magnetic monopoles and calculate the field on analogy with an electric dipole (two opposite charges separated by distance d). Find the vector sum of fields from the two monopoles and take the limit as r >> d. It's probably easiest to do this along the axis of the dipole, or along a line perpendicular to the midpoint of the dipole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top